Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Specializing in Modern Numismatics Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer 300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Counterfeit Error

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 16 / Views: 2,081Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 09/30/2006  08:40 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Meiji03 - Thanks for doing that. I am reluctant to sign up for too many sites because it seems every time I do - I cause problems for my PC.

Anyway I looked at the two scans. These both appear fine to me based on what I see. This series is as far as I know not fully standardized. Production levels between 1891 and 1895 are likely too high (over 72,000,000 coins) to presume individual die manufacture but too low to require that a master hub was in use. The fact that there are hub variations is proven by the existance of two 1892 varieties listed in Krause. The two coins in the picture were made 4 years appart, one on either side of the Krause "variety" so there had to be a change in hubs - perhaps more than one.

The period of manufacture 1891 and 1895 precisely brackets the ramp up in production associated with the world silver glut of 1893 and falls just before the 1897 Demonetization of the Yen by Japan. It is interesting to note that while US production rates of the Dollar dropped - Japan was increasing production. That may be why the two governments ultimately approached the situation differently.

Anyway, the variations I can see seem within reason to me and could be attributed to the use of multiple hubs. There are no telltale signs of forgery on either coin. Unless I had other facts available, I would say both are real.
  Previous TopicReplies: 16 / Views: 2,081Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.19 seconds to rattle this change. Forums