Comparisons for "back then" are useless. In 1964, authors were pointing out that if you bought a roll of each cent since the Lincolns started, your under-$100 investment would be worth five figures.
What they didn't point out was that was purely because no one bothered to do that, making MS early coins hard to find.
The second problem is that investments like that don't scale. Speculators in 1964 took that info, and figured that if they bought a bag (or hundreds of bags) of each date, in 50 years, they'd be millionaires. The number of collectors didn't grow 5000 times, and there were many times the cents available from circulation.
It looked like a no-lose proposition, after all, you could always spend them. Start counting the cost of getting them, storing them, insuring them or having them stolen, and decades of lost interest. The only reason a bag of 1964 LMC is worth more than face today is its copper content, not any collector value. I'm sure if someone wanted a hundred unc bags, it wouldn't be that difficult to find them.
What they didn't point out was that was purely because no one bothered to do that, making MS early coins hard to find.
The second problem is that investments like that don't scale. Speculators in 1964 took that info, and figured that if they bought a bag (or hundreds of bags) of each date, in 50 years, they'd be millionaires. The number of collectors didn't grow 5000 times, and there were many times the cents available from circulation.
It looked like a no-lose proposition, after all, you could always spend them. Start counting the cost of getting them, storing them, insuring them or having them stolen, and decades of lost interest. The only reason a bag of 1964 LMC is worth more than face today is its copper content, not any collector value. I'm sure if someone wanted a hundred unc bags, it wouldn't be that difficult to find them.




















