| Author |
Replies: 31 / Views: 4,021 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1547 Posts |
Quote: Now this is a space filler for the 1960-D D/D Large over Small Date... Whenever I get enough posts to auction here, I'll start the bid at $1.00 (has to be worth a buck)... Too bad about the harsh cleaning but the coin is still marketable from a variety standpoint. It just won't make it into a PCGS slab.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
I have edited this thread to remove all the arguing back and forth. To the two guys that was doing it, You can take this as a First warning....there will not be a second one
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1812 Posts |
It should be noted that I did NOT post this coin with any dollar value in mind. When I first joined this forum I mentioned that I was a "error" collector, and NOT a "variety" collector. This post was only to share with the variety collectors in this forum that a fifty year old ***Doubled Die Obverse (1-0-III) and Repunched Mintmark (RPM#100)*** Lincoln Cent variety coin can still be found in circulation, I did not expect all the negative comments saying it's not worth collecting due to the cleaning that WAS required to show the RPM Variety, had I opted to post the original find untouched, I believe these same critics would have expressed their negative opinion that the photo doesn't show a repunched mintmark. Anyway, I enjoy visiting this site and sharing some of my USA and World Errors with other collectors on this site without a dollar value as motive to post (and I did post high value errors without mention of value), when that happens it's time to move on. ***data from "The CherryPickers' Guide to rare die varieties - fourth edition - volume one" By Bill Fivaz and J.T.Stanton***
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3592 Posts |
BrokenCoin, I think you raised a good point and hate to see you leave because all of us did not have a negative view, and you are exactly right in that you asked nothing about value.Personally I hate the negativity associated with even the slightest hint of cleaning as if it were a fatal disease. I should hope that all posters try to remember what the OP is asking when they reply in the future (myself included)Sorry to see you go.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
601 Posts |
BrokenCoin- I'll be the first to agree with you- some coins HAVE to be "excavated" if they are to have ANY redeeming value at all. This post wasn't about what the coin was or wasn't and argument over what it obviously was wasted people's time.
It's VERY frustrating when people completely overlook the point you're trying to make and bicker about the absurd.
I, for one, REALLY enjoyed the subject of the thread. You're exactly what this forum needs- thoughtful and provocative subjects that make people contemplate issues.
It would be a loss for EVERYONE if you threw your hands up.....I've been there multiple times since joining, but if WE work to outnumber THEM, the CCF forum will be a wonderful place for it.
Thanks very much for sharing, I look forward to your future posts!
-Chris.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts |
Quote: I enjoy visiting this site and sharing some of my USA and World Errors with other collectors on this site without a dollar value as motive to post I see your point but once you are here for a while, you will realize that we have multiple drive-by posters everyday who post a coin and really only care about value.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
601 Posts |
In all fairness, trying to take the financial aspect out of coins is kind of like well, skip the metaphor, it's just not realistic.
I've noticed that sometimes, people are offended by the suggestion of value. I understand that that may not be one's primary motivation in collecting, but isn't it smart for everyone to know what they've got?
I'm not trying to pick an argument- just curious about other's perspective on the matter, uh, maybe a new thread would be better for the subject. Anyway, just wondering.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
If I had a reason to need one of these I wouldn't mind paying some modest premium for it even though it has been cleaned. It obviously is what it is, and they are scarce no matter the condition. To state that these have no value if cleaned is, well...just wrong.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
601 Posts |
|
|
New Member
United States
33 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1812 Posts |
To; Bryan1315 (Moderator), You can delete this thread at your convenience... I should be posting some unique error coins from Spain's Euro coinage Tuesday...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
Just remember that this is a US error and variety section.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
126 Posts |
How would, on any coin, whether error,variety, or normal would someone like myself know if its been cleaned, or restored, then dirtied again to make look like its not been cleaned as well. I ask this because I went to a coin shop the other day to get some sleeves and saw the owner was selling coins that had said CLEANED on it, but it was a 1955 DDO, the nice one and it was in the 2 thousand $ range? I guess he was being honest, but how would we as non experts know otherwise? Man that was a nice looking coin too.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1388 Posts |
I have no idea what all the fuss was, but anyway. There is a difference between cleaning(scrubbing and all that), and conservation. I think this is a fine effort at conservation(although I made the mistake of calling it cleaning in an earlier post). Look at the Morgan series for example, there are many that have been conserved. If it is an effort to save a rarity, I think it is doing a favor to the hobby. U.S. coin collecting(in general) is about our heritage and history, and I appreciate that... You have posted some good threads Broken-Coin, there are many that would hate to see ya go, especially in this way. This is a Community after all, and our different viewpoints should bring us together. Sorry if this is ranting, or needs to be edited. It's just my opinion...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
601 Posts |
Thank you Darth! You've re-affirmed what I've thought for a long time now, I'm not crazy! Initially, in my coin career, I really wrestled with the ethical issues of conservation/cleaning. Here's what I finally understood and have come to firmly believe- Coin Cleaning- Cleaning makes a coin unattractive and as a result, severely impairs it's numismatic value. I think that there are 2 main sources of cleaned coins- 1. Novice Collectors and hobby enthusiasts. These people are either new to coin collecting, or are doing what they think will increase the value of Grandpa's inherited collection. I see tons of cleaned Lincolns in bulk wheat bags. Most of these are popped out of Whitman folders. Lack of education is the cause. 2. Shady dealers/resellers. Again, lack of knowledge by a flea market vendor or other reseller can be at fault. But the other side is dealers who would rather con a collector out of money than earn it through a relationship of trust. These type are predators in all angles of the deal. I will buy a cleaned coin if it's exceedingly rare, but in nearly all cases, the reputable dealer HAS disclosed the state of the coin. I actually have more respect and trust in a dealer who clearly states the coin's negative issues on the 2x2. Conserved Coins- As Darth so lucidly stated, a "conserved" coin is one that has been lovingly preserved. Much as a museum curator does what's in his collection's best interest, we love our coins and want what is truly best for them! Take for example, an AU 1914-D Lincoln which sat in a greasy and dusty setting for a long time, maybe lost behind a stove or fridge for decades. When found, the coin has organic buildup that is caked on and hard. If you try to scrape it off, the soft copper surface will be damaged. (study up and practice A LOT- KNOW what you're doing for the following) A coin lover can use the right solvents and remove the surface debris, to reveal an original and lustrous coin. A coin that is "conserved" is resored- professionally. Coins of this nature, when done correctly, can certify with any major TPG. This is a procedure of love, as well as common sense. Coins which are Tooled, to bring out detail are done to deceive, and are not considered conserved. I have a big coin dealer in town with who I once interviewed for a job with. I quickly realized that his back room was a "coin manufacturing room". He would strip the surface of an XF 19th century copper coin. Then re-tool the surface to increase eye appeal and give it the appearance of having a much more bold strike. Then said dealer applied artificial patina to imitate that of 150 year old luster. POOF! He then had a gorgeous mid grade uncirculated example. I'm not kidding or exaggerating. I wanted more than anything to work in a big coin shop, but I declined the job because it would have literally been selling selling my soul to the devil. I've even contacted PCGS because the dealer was so cavalier as to brag about being able to get his work slabbed, but I don't think they've made any attempt to take action. The problem is bigger than even they have the financial means to correct with their guarantee. SO SORRY for droning on- as I mature in my coin career, I find myself so strongly wanting to advocate for the collector and little guy, that my ire is easily raised! I truly feel that all of the information above is important for everyone to understand. Again, sorry for stealing 10 minutes of your life!
|
| |
Replies: 31 / Views: 4,021 |