| Author |
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,963 |
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188917 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
737 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
I saw that on DL's website, it is a nice looking coin finger print or not. The bad thing about it is that chances are that the finger print was put on there when it was slabbed by a PCGS employee since they do not use gloves
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
642 Posts |
No gloves?! Really? I didn't realize that. So why should we be sending coins off to be slabbed?
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4849 Posts |
Quote: The bad thing about it is that chances are that the finger print was put on there when it was slabbed by a PCGS employee since they do not use gloves Wow, I hope not. I mean, even circ strikes are bad to touch on the surface, but on proof coins that is the ultimate sin! If it is a PCGS employee, the good news is we have forensic evidence needed to track him down! 
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
9104 Posts |
I'm not so sure that's a fingerprint. Looks like patterning from the fabric of a bag, tho I dunno why a proof would be in a bag.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
it really looks like a finger print to me 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8904 Posts |
Quote: Looks like patterning from the fabric of a bag, I'm more inclined to go with a fingerprint. The lines curve. Since this coin is a proof, it's MUCH more susceptible to fingerprints. (At least it's not on the obverse...)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3179 Posts |
Really, no gloves?  
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
I don't really see a problem here. Just dipping it in Jewlery Cleaners for a few days should fix that.  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6390 Posts |
It would be interesting to send it back to CAC and see if they would still consider it premium quality for the assigned grade. If they agree the fingerprint make it less than a PQ PR-67 coin that would suggest the print developed after the coin was slabbed. That in turn would implicate the handling process at PCGS.
I wonder if crime lab technicians could obtain a usable partial print from it, and whether that could be done without further damaging the coin?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
That fingerprint was on there when the coin was slabbed, unless you think that coin did all that toning and turned those colors in the slab in the less than five years since it was put in that holder.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
I said chances are, not that it was a fact that it happened at PCGS. There is always going to be a chance since they do not wear gloves
|
|
Valued Member
United States
341 Posts |
I, like others, find it surprising that they don't wear gloves. There must be a reasoning behind it. But what?
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188917 Posts |
Wearing gloves reduces tactile sensitivity. One is more likely to drop a coin when wearing gloves. Dropping it could be worse than touching it. As long as it is handled by the edge, gloves are unnecessary.
|
| |
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,963 |