Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors 300,000 items to help build your collection! Specializing in Modern Numismatics Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1878 S Morgan

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 11 / Views: 1,345Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
Sidekick-CA's Avatar
United States
509 Posts
 Posted 05/26/2011  1:57 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Sidekick-CA to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Make AU50

1878-S-Morgan

1878-S-Morgan
Pillar of the Community
Freedom's Avatar
United States
526 Posts
 Posted 05/26/2011  2:40 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Freedom to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The broken star, third from the bottom right on the obverse almost makes this look like a VAM99 but would need a loop to check the eyelid and reverse.

I would grade this coin in the VF category, possibly VF-40. The reverse has a rim ding in it but it seems to retain a lot of its original luster. The obverse on the other hand, in my opinion only, is what is bringing the grade down a little.

The rim ding at 6:30 on the reverse and Noon on the obverse play a major part as well. I am gonna have to guess between XF-40 and VF. I would need to see a "Reed" shot of the edge of the coin to be certain.
Valued Member
United States
312 Posts
 Posted 05/26/2011  2:55 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mshev to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I think AU-50 sounds good. It's got pretty minimal wear, good luster, but a lot of marks on the obverse. Nice toning on it :)
Pillar of the Community
nlp coins's Avatar
United States
2373 Posts
 Posted 05/26/2011  2:59 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nlp coins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Easy AU53. I'd pay 55 money for it in a flash. nlp
Rest in Peace
coinguybrian's Avatar
United States
5375 Posts
 Posted 05/26/2011  5:01 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coinguybrian to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Yeah, AU
Pillar of the Community
Canadian-Banknotes's Avatar
Canada
4944 Posts
 Posted 05/26/2011  5:09 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Canadian-Banknotes to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Yeah. AU-50/53 sounds right
Pillar of the Community
mitchhailey's Avatar
United States
1150 Posts
 Posted 05/27/2011  05:30 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mitchhailey to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
They sure knew what they were doing at the San Fran mint when it came to strikes on Morgans.
Pillar of the Community
Rsxtacee's Avatar
United States
737 Posts
 Posted 05/27/2011  06:14 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Rsxtacee to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
AU sounds good to me. It's a beauty!
Pillar of the Community
Freedom's Avatar
United States
526 Posts
 Posted 05/27/2011  06:18 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Freedom to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
While the reverse seems to be AU, the obverse has a lot of things going on. It is a VAM variety, just haven't figured out which one yet. The deep gouges on the face and the fields of the obverse along with the Rim Dings detract from its grade. I believe that sometime in the past, this coin might have been cleaned than rubbed down with an old Coin Shop cloth to disguise the dip. The 1878 is heavily encrusted while the majority of the clear and open areas are free of debris. If the date has that much dirt from the years showing, I would expect the whole coin
to have SOME in most crevices. I am going to stick with VF on this coin. The process to determine the number is magic and I don't believe in wizards or witches..

If those minor issues were not there, I would grade this coin at least AU50, but then again, this is my love/hobby so I am probably wrong.....

Wife said it wouldn't be the first time either....
Moderator
Learn More...
SsuperDdave's Avatar
United States
23522 Posts
 Posted 05/27/2011  11:57 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SsuperDdave to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
While the reverse seems to be AU, the obverse has a lot of things going on. It is a VAM variety, just haven't figured out which one yet. The deep gouges on the face and the fields of the obverse along with the Rim Dings detract from its grade. I believe that sometime in the past, this coin might have been cleaned than rubbed down with an old Coin Shop cloth to disguise the dip. The 1878 is heavily encrusted while the majority of the clear and open areas are free of debris. If the date has that much dirt from the years showing, I would expect the whole coin
to have SOME in most crevices. I am going to stick with VF on this coin. The process to determine the number is magic and I don't believe in wizards or witches..

If those minor issues were not there, I would grade this coin at least AU50, but then again, this is my love/hobby so I am probably wrong.....


Very well reasoned, but a bit harsh in my opinion.

I completely agree regarding the toning. It's just *too* thick about the date and right stars, in just the places which would be left by a casual removal. The "blotchy" nature of the returning toning tends to support the idea that it's a recovering coin.

When one sees such a detail disparity between obverse and reverse, the immediate conclusion is die wear. There's no way the obverse could have worn to this point through circulation while the reverse remains near-Mint State. So, when grading you take into account what must have been a thoroughly-whipped obverse die, and consider what remains of the "best" that die was still capable of.

I would not be surprised if this coin has seen no circulation. The obverse marks which Freedom so accurately draws attention to would be faded by circulation; such marks go away faster (especially on the cheek) than detail does when the coin is rubbed in one's hand. How many EF-AU coins have you seen with such shallow, yet heavy, marks? A gouge which survives into EF-level wear is a deep one indeed.

Furthermore, I've always found it difficult to believe that "Almost Uncirculated" coins can be at all common. If it circulated, it circulated.

Freedom practices a somewhat stricter mathematics of grading than do I, and this must be admitted and respected. I consider either method, and all in between, valid.

But if it hasn't circulated, it must be assigned a Mint State grade to me. MS61, cleaned and retoned.
Pillar of the Community
Sidekick-CA's Avatar
United States
509 Posts
 Posted 05/27/2011  6:38 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Sidekick-CA to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for all the input guys. Not sure what to think now. Seems to be quite a variance. Guess I'll just take the middle ground and consider it AU50 but I did like nlp's response
Quote:
I'd pay 55 money for it in a flash


Freedom, thanks for the heads up on possible VAM. I'm not a vammer but since you've given me a head start with something to go on think I'll take a look at VW and try to attribute it.
Pillar of the Community
Las_Vegas_Larry's Avatar
United States
817 Posts
 Posted 05/27/2011  10:28 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Las_Vegas_Larry to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I agree with SuperDave. I certainly could not have said it better. But I think MS60.
  Previous TopicReplies: 11 / Views: 1,345Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.3 seconds to rattle this change. Forums