| Author |
 Replies: 29 / Views: 8,146 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2408 Posts |
 poboxw I believe the various colors are achieved through anodizing the surface. I just hope that the colors remain stable over time... Will be interesting to see. Can't wait to get mine. |
|
Pillar of the Community
Germany
992 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2408 Posts |
Thanks for the link Redlock, this is so cool. Niobium, wow.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1502 Posts |
Thanks canadian_coins!
Can't wait to get mine either. Still unsure about how i'll take it, being not a big fan of colourized coins in general. I think that the selective anodizing/colourization is a good touch though. It makes the colouring reasonable and purposeful, as oppose to just a blotch in the middle of any ol'design.
Edited by poboxw
06/08/2011 2:27 pm
|
|
Moderator
 Canada
10458 Posts |
Quote:
And you have to wonder how much of Canada's vastness has actually been mineralogically surveyed Very little actually, especially in the north. Welcome to my world... "Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert OppenheimerContent of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_USMy eBay store
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1581 Posts |
Quick all you Master's Club Members:  Yes, that's right, yours for only $129.95.88 CAD per coin |
|
Valued Member
Canada
322 Posts |
I think it's neat that these new coins have a solid sterling silver Reverse......
sets them apart from the ordinary toonie appearance...look forward to receiving them in Aug.....
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
153 Posts |
too expensive, and 7500 mintage is not a small number
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2408 Posts |
I find the price a bit high too, but considering this is a Niobium first I think this set has some potential.
I wonder, if the Mint picked the twonie's shape and size, why not keep the $2 face value?
Better yet, why not continue with the larger bi-metallic 40mm (1 oz) 8-dollar size used in 2005?
The Mint had to create yet another variant.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
322 Posts |
I see this series hit the last chance list on the mint web site a few days ago..soon to sell out...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2408 Posts |
Officially sold-out. But the reviews are not so good.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2408 Posts |
The next in the series is better, in my opinion.  |
|
Valued Member
Canada
322 Posts |
Quote:
But the reviews are not so good Most of the reviews with negative comments refer to the pricing and not the actual coin...I ordered the series so I can't give the coin a  since I won't see mine till Aug. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2408 Posts |
Yes, too small and too pricey were the negatives. My point of view is why the $5 face value if the coin has the same size as a $2 dollar? I get the different metal, but yet another hybrid in the NCLT realm... This coin should have been $8, and the size of the 120th anniversary of the canadian pacific railway, 2005. Much larger at 40 mm, and at least 1 oz of pure silver.  The Mint missed a great opportunity to promote continuity from past NCLT releases. |
| |
Replies: 29 / Views: 8,146 |
First Page
Posted 06/05/2011 05:15 am
(and no, I do not collect them):
