Posted 06/07/2011 11:02 pm
I would go both at AU-55. The reverses are amazing and don't show any wear (at least to my eyes). The obverses show a lack of detail, but owing to the condition of the reverses and the lack of rim dings from any wear, I think it's a strike( or even a photography) problem.
(Though, I hate disagreeing with Johnny "Countdown" 'cause he's usually right!)
(Though, I hate disagreeing with Johnny "Countdown" 'cause he's usually right!)
. Your opinion is just as valid as mine. Wear is hard to decipher, but I am seeing very little luster on the first one which is why I graded it lower(an AU should have a fair amount of discernable luster). Also the eagle's neck is soft on that one. The second one appears to have much more luster, which made me think it wasn't an issue with the photography.
