Thanks you guys. I agree with the lackluster.
But I also like the look it has. Kind of like what a coin this age is supposed to look like. Got handled a little bit early on then just sat around and aged gracefully.
Do you think that first star (right side looking) is more so
from the strike than from wear ? If from wear then a detail
53 may fit. If from strike a 55 ? Minus luster a 50 ?
I would be thrilled with a 50 overall. This coin would fit the bill for a decent 1857 date set of all denoms. I.E.: Cent, nickel etc.