| Author |
 Replies: 11 / Views: 920 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1703 Posts |
Not trying to start anything but I would like your opinions.   |
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
I likes it, I would say this one is about a MS-64 with a definite weak strike
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1703 Posts |
Thanks Bryan, I was starting to think no one was going to have the intestinal fortitude to grade the O's anymore.Unfortunatly or Fortunatly (for me cause I like em  ) their always going to be out there and the more we look at and grade them the better we will all become at it.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1267 Posts |
I'll take a shot at it. I'll say ms63 shot 64 on a good day. This coin has that nice original skin look to it, I like it!  BTW TLS5933, when I first started collecting Morgans my first two coins were an 1889-0 and an 1892-0, both entombed in ngc plastic and graded ms64. My goal was to put together an 0-mint date set. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7123 Posts |
I think MS-63 I cant see why anyone would collect the Morgan series of coins, especially the O mints !! My advice stop buying them !!  Rick |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1703 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1703 Posts |
quote:
Originally posted by Metalman
I think MS-63
I cant see why anyone would collect the Morgan series of coins, especially the O mints !! My advice stop buying them !!
Rick
I can't Like potato chips no one can buy just one.  |
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
I'd rather larger pics, but you got the luster nicely represented. I think the consensus is right with this one. MS63, but I could go higher or lower with larger pics of the obverse.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1703 Posts |
quote:
Originally posted by SuperDave
I'd rather larger pics, but you got the luster nicely represented. I think the consensus is right with this one. MS63, but I could go higher or lower with larger pics of the obverse.
Little larger,hope that helps.  |
|
Moderator
United States
23522 Posts |
Dang, that's a beat strike. 64 is a possibility, but this year was known for decent strikes, so I doubt it. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1703 Posts |
You all are doing good.   |
|
Moderator
United States
23522 Posts |
In both pics, I saw the 2 as an 8 and thought you'd mistyped. 1892-O Morgans are notorious for weak strikes; yours is not bad for the date and more understandably MS64. 1898-O's, which I thought the coin actually was, are better known for good strikes.
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 920 |
|
Posted 11/27/2006 6:49 pm
