Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors 300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Specializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1988 LMC RDV?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 1,012Next Topic  
Moderator
Learn More...
John1's Avatar
United States
56855 Posts
 Posted 09/13/2011  10:14 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add John1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Yes-No-Maybe? What do you all think? Thanks,John1
1988-LMC-RDV?
1988-LMC-RDV?
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 09/13/2011  10:54 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Are these images of the same coin?
1988-LMC-RDV?

Pillar of the Community
Jayman931's Avatar
United States
2651 Posts
 Posted 09/13/2011  12:00 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Jayman931 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I will say 005...I'm 75% sure of it. Its a late die stage. I will make a pic to show why think it is because it is hard to tell...
Pillar of the Community
Jayman931's Avatar
United States
2651 Posts
 Posted 09/13/2011  12:25 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Jayman931 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
This is by no means scientific..but sometimes I do this (use angles and distances to figure things out...but I adjusted the shadows and contrast and tried to use angles. To be honest the one pic definitely looks like a 005 (the top of the G) but the other pic taken at a different angle makes the G look different. So I am not convinced either way...What do you think?

1988-LMC-RDV?
1988-LMC-RDV?
1988-LMC-RDV?
Edited by Jayman931
09/13/2011 12:28 pm
Rest in Peace
numismo's Avatar
United States
3039 Posts
 Posted 09/13/2011  1:15 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add numismo to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Sorry, just an 005 (unflared G)
Pillar of the Community
yankee1227's Avatar
United States
1151 Posts
 Posted 09/13/2011  3:50 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add yankee1227 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I concur 005
Pillar of the Community
Tunnioc's Avatar
United States
3173 Posts
 Posted 09/13/2011  3:53 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Tunnioc to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The G doesn't look right.
Pillar of the Community
jdavis18's Avatar
United States
553 Posts
 Posted 09/13/2011  4:16 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jdavis18 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I agree on 05, I don't see the serifs on the g
Moderator
Learn More...
John1's Avatar
United States
56855 Posts
 Posted 09/13/2011  5:07 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add John1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It is the same coin. Thanks all for your help. I am going to set it free back to the wild.
John1
  Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 1,012Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.25 seconds to rattle this change. Forums