5 Morgan 81-S For Grading - Coin Community Forum

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Author	Replies: 8 / Views: 1,236
shadowtrooper78 Pillar of the Community United States 1370 Posts	Posted 09/13/2011 5:06 pm Which one for my dansco? choices choices 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. I believe this one to be proof like Report this Post to the Staff

Las_Vegas_Larry Pillar of the Community United States 817 Posts	Posted 09/13/2011 7:50 pm 1. MS64 Best reverse 2. MS65 that is the Dansco member. 3. AU58 4. AU58 looks like doubling on the reverse. 5. MS62/63 semi-PL or PL maybe. Photo are a little rough 3 & 4 could MS I'm not sure. Report this Post to the Staff
shadowtrooper78 Pillar of the Community United States 1370 Posts	Posted 09/13/2011 7:55 pm Hey thanks for the feedback....these are all MS coins....#3 was pulled out of a pcgs holder as an MS 64....#4 is very similar to #3.....I am partial to #2 though....picked that one up last weekend at a coin show for $65. Report this Post to the Staff
Las_Vegas_Larry Pillar of the Community United States 817 Posts	Posted 09/13/2011 8:11 pm I guess it was glare on 3. & 4. that I was not sure of. I like 3. that would be my second choice. The only mark on the face is to the left of the ear or is that a reflection? Report this Post to the Staff
shadowtrooper78 Pillar of the Community United States 1370 Posts	Posted 09/13/2011 8:14 pm 3 is what I have in my dansco right now ....which that is glare in the picture.....have felt this coin was under graded by pcgs....but we all have those stories Report this Post to the Staff
fenton Pillar of the Community United States 4989 Posts	Posted 09/13/2011 10:39 pm Based on the photos I think #3 is the nicest in the set MS-64+ shot at MS-65. Reasonable for PCGS to give it a 64 though I don't think it was dramatically undergraded. #2 has amazing toning but I think it is I think a hair below #3 for technical grade. Top portion of the obverse seems to have a bit of a film though. I'd go with #3 for the album. Others are mix of 63+, 64 nice set of coins Report this Post to the Staff
chris beatie Valued Member 344 Posts	Posted 09/14/2011 07:09 am My favorite was 4 just going on looks. Report this Post to the Staff
shadowtrooper78 Pillar of the Community United States 1370 Posts	Posted 09/14/2011 09:05 am #4 was my least expensive purchase of the group at a touch over melt....which was a great deal. #2 is either bag toned or end of roll toned, the "film" light area on the top portion of the coin is where I believe the coin was not in contact with the bag or the paper on a roll. 2, 3 and 4 are some of my nicer toned morgans and I'm a sucker for good color, one will go in my morgan set and one will find its place in my type set. I have a soft spot for the 80-s and 81-s both incredible strikes for the morgan series. Report this Post to the Staff
D0ubl3Eagle Pillar of the Community United States 5854 Posts	Posted 09/14/2011 1:09 pm I would go with 3. I like the toning on that one the most. Edited by D0ubl3Eagle 09/14/2011 1:09 pm Report this Post to the Staff
	Replies: 8 / Views: 1,236

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

All Forums Category: US Coins and Currency Forums Forum: US Classic and Colonial Coin Grading

Silver Gold Bull US is the United States leading bullion dealer. We deliver gold coins, gold bars, silver coins, silver bars and precious metals to your door. Order today!

The First Dollar, your premier source for bullion and rare coins. See our bullion list on the site and the coin inventory on ebay.

View Last 100 New Topics

View Last 100 Active Topics

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum

It took 0.3 seconds to rattle this change.