|
This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!
To participate in the forum you must log in or register. | Author |
Replies: 107 / Views: 8,958 |
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
410 Posts |
I don't have to be optimistic to say that the global economy will get better. For thousands of years economic crisis have come and gone. They always end. Sometimes they end badly for one particular group of people, but global commerce goes on. I believe that going forward a successful investor will be invested globally. The United States has already fallen to only 30% of global equity.
The longer silver prices stay artificially inflated the harder the fall will be. Industrial users of silver hate paying current prices. The longer prices stay high the more incentive companies have to find alternative materials to replace the use of silver in their products.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2335 Posts |
I've said this before & am going to throw it out there again because I have never got a serious response. The industrial use of silver is well below the annual production of silver. The creation of silver EFT's caused a huge demand for physical silver to back the shares, which is the main driving force behind the rise in prices. That means the rise in price is speculative. Does anyone care to comment?
|
|
New Member
United States
29 Posts |
I agree that the economy will eventually get better. The difference is that I believe this downturn is secular; not cyclical. Meaning it will probably take another decade or so to sort out. The Western World has huge structural economic issues that won't be corrected without great pain. Sovereign defaults, the collapse of the EU and Japan, along with a set back in China are all realistic events that could take place this decade. Fiat currencies usually don't last longer than 40 years. The conditions for the PM bull market are intact, and look to be for the foreseeable future. Quote: As to Kyle Bass... I serioussly doubt any hedge fund manager has the general publics best interests in the forefront of their minds when they're releasing media blurbs made to look like interviews to the world at large. Their primary concern (and rightfully so) is to their investors. (I didn't watch the whole thing... have to go to work... It's more than an hour long.) The first 9 minutes or so are just meh, but it gets very interesting after that.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5855 Posts |
Quote: JSH Said: Personally I think we are in the "bull trap" phase of your graph. I expect another silver to take another good run before the bubble bursts. If I'm right, I sell at the right time and make some money. If I'm wrong and it keeps going up, I still made money. If I'm wrong and we are heading towards "dispair", I have some nice shiny proof sets that I like. I'm with you, JSH! Well, in part, at least. I haven't been able to bring myself to buy large quantities of bullion or junk silver coins, since I'm not convinced that silver will continue to rise forever (or even for the long term). So whenever I buy silver I buy rolls of BU or Proof coins (at a premium, of course) because I like to look at them. If silver really does take off and hit $100/ounce or more, it won't really matter whether I paid a premium or not. And if it crashed back down to $4/ounce, well, these are all coins I want anyway and will still be happy to look at them for years and years and then pass down to my son some day. Quote: trdhrdr007 Said: I've said this before & am going to throw it out there again because I have never got a serious response. The industrial use of silver is well below the annual production of silver. The creation of silver EFT's caused a huge demand for physical silver to back the shares, which is the main driving force behind the rise in prices. That means the rise in price is speculative. Does anyone care to comment? I think you're probably right. Despite all the doom & gloom predictions I have heard, I just can't believe that silver will really be as valuable as gold someday. Speculation aside, however, I suppose owning tons of silver (and gold) is probably still a good idea as a hedge against a total collapse of the U.S. economy. It might not ever be worth $100/ounce, but it may someday be the only currency accepted.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2168 Posts |
I look at PM as a store of value. I lived in the 1960s as a very young child I was oe of those that kept silver coins as well as wheat pennies! Still have them. In the past about 2 years I have felt a very bad feeling about the dollar as well as all unbacked currencies. I have tried to get some PM with small amounts as I can. My feeling is that if currencies collapse silver junk (as well as any easily recognized form) will be put to use. If things recover still have silver value and all will be better. I also am in agreement with nickel keeping! Win win there no loss factor (except very low interest). Always can spend or if collApse they are real money as any coin actually is. (Some intrinsic not like paper) of course just my gut feeling
|
|
Valued Member
United States
232 Posts |
why do people hoard nickels? Is there reasons to believe nickel will boom in the near future?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3670 Posts |
"why do people hoard nickels?" Easy, our gambling speculative nature always tells us to buy large amounts of something esp if it cheap, if there is any reason to believe it will increase largely in value in near time.... Silver was 4 bucks an oz. back around 2000, and I am sure someone asked the same question about silver, that you now impose for nickel, or why not copper as well, or tin.... I will say, I don't agree with spring cypress, or JSH on all issues, and disagree with many, but you do present your arguments in a much more professional way, as opposed to some silver trolls who have 3 letters in their name (not you JSH its Joe rof  )who will remain nameless, lol..... And Spring I do get the tulip angle and being first bubble it does have relevance, but part of me always wants to point out it is a way different world now compared to then. The game has changed in many ways, question is can the smart investors find a way to adapt with it, in these most unpredictable economic times.... "I don't have to be optimistic to say that the global economy will get better. For thousands of years economic crisis have come and gone. They always end. Sometimes they end badly for one particular group of people, but global commerce goes on. I believe that going forward a successful investor will be invested globally. The United States has already fallen to only 30% of global equity." And I can agree with many points in this quote, but keep in mind JSH we are not immune being the big powerful USA to these simple laws of economy, and there have been others that simply did not recover as you also mentioned, and there aint no guarantee in paper I can promise that says we will not be the next..... "I've said this before & am going to throw it out there again because I have never got a serious response. The industrial use of silver is well below the annual production of silver." If I read that correctly I believe you be 180 degrees backwards on this theory 007. As I believe personally there is way less coming out of the ground, compared to the orders coming in for it. If you are right and I am wrong, I still think it will swing the way I see it here within ten years.... Oh and JSH, replacement metals found in the future for silver, we have covered that as well in the past, and it is a feasible point IMO....
Edited by Silverhawk74 11/18/2011 2:37 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
666 Posts |
Barry your buying strategy and rationale mirrors my own sort of... I've never been a bullion buyer. However, I have bought coins since I was little bitty. I really am not that concerned about the rise and fall of the base metal content because I'm interested in the coin itself.
The meteroic rise of the gold etf would scare the bejesus out of me if I was only interested in price appreciation. If I were to be buying a commodity right now I for sure wouldn't be buying GDX but be looking at a natural gas etf.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2168 Posts |
For the nickel question. I have decided to keep a few hundred dollars in nickels since they are the only 'real ' money now aside from pre 1982 pennies. No cost factor and I guess since I was taught at a Very young age to keep the silver coins! You never know what may happen and if nickel or copper don't become more valuable I just spend the nickels! Also, in deciding to pick some up, the very first roll I counted had a silver nickel so I decided to count them all a s I got them and have a roll of silver as well as Buffalo nickels. Nickels are reaLly the only coins not picked through yet!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
302 Posts |
Quote: My understanding is the the Hunt brothers were only trying to corner the silver markets. The Hunt brothers were trying to corner the silver market. And gold did go up at the same time, but not nearly as fast. At the top silver was about $50 per ounce and gold about $800 per ounce, or a 16 to 1 ratio. Today silver is running around $31 and gold around $1700, about a 55 to 1 ratio. If silver had kept up with gold on this runup compared to the Hunt brothers runup, silver today would be about $106 per ounce. Likewise if gold had not left silver behind, gold would be about $500 per ounce. Since I believe the normal price ratio to be about 35 to one, either gold prices are too high in relation to silver, or silver prices are too low. That means there is a lot of room for the two to eventually meet somewhere in the middle. Basically silver led the way in the Hunt brothers era dragging gold along with it. Today the reverse is true. Sooner or later there will be a gold bubble - maybe it is already here. As for a silver bubble? Not unless it catches up with gold. I see a realistic floor of $20 for silver and $1000 for gold, which is still a 50 to 1 ratio, and still out of line for what I believe is the "normal" ratio. Based on the ease of "printing" new electrons and the mindset of "helicopter" Bernanke, I have serious doubts that we will see such levels any time in the near future. However, if we do, I would be inclined to "sell the farm" and dump all into PM. Quote: Gold also had a huge run followed by a equally huge crash in the same time period. Not quite. Silver crashed by over 90%. Gold crashed about 60%. Not what I would consider an "equally huge crash." ********** As a side note, note that FDR confiscated gold in 1933, four years after the 1929 dump. 2012 is four years after the 2008 debacle.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2335 Posts |
Quote: "I've said this before & am going to throw it out there again because I have never got a serious response. The industrial use of silver is well below the annual production of silver." Quote: If I read that correctly I believe you be 180 degrees backwards on this theory 007. As I believe personally there is way less coming out of the ground, compared to the orders coming in for it. If you are right and I am wrong, I still think it will swing the way I see it here within ten years.... Here's a link to an article by The Silver Institute entitled "Silver Investment the Dominant Driver of a Remarkable 2010". In my original statement I referenced annual production of silver. I meant mined & recycled, but we can go with mined if you like. According to them in 2010 735.9 million ounces were mined & 487.4 million ounces were used in industrial applications. http://www.silverinstitute.org/pr07apr2011.phpIndustrial applications did show an increase of 20% over 2009. They also state that the increase brought production back to the level it was prior to the recession. That doesn't suggest that industrial demand will continue to increase at that rate. In fact, if that was a normal increase it wouldn't have been highlighted. You could make a case that lumping photography, jewelry & silverware in with the industrial applications category would bring the total used in fabrication over the level of silver mined. If you wanted to go there I'd have to counter that 215 million ounces(roughly 29%) were recycled as scrap. I'd suggest that's probably a sustainable ratio of recycling. You will notice I totally disregarded the amount of silver used to produce coins. That's due to the fact that silver coins are no longer used in everyday commerce, & are primarily investment vehicles. Read the entire article, look at the headline, keep an open mind & come to your own conclusions. While you are doing that keep the following in mind. As/IF the price of silver rises it becomes feasible to mine areas that aren't profitable enough to mine at current price levels. As/If prices rise to a certain level alternative materials can/will be used as substitutes. Both sides of the supply demand equation are fluid & can go either direction.
Edited by trdhrdr007 11/18/2011 3:21 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
667 Posts |
I am not sure how many actual silver cons and rounds are produced but just looking at the ASE, MAPLE and Panda last year there were over 60,000,000 one once coins. Now toss in all the other countries, silver mints sets and misc rounds it has to be more than double this amount. Didn't take the time to really figure out the total amount of silver - just giving it a fast look.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
548 Posts |
I think we're seeing two issues in the recent bullion market: - long term value of these PM's - short term volatility It's the volatility that freaks folks out. So much strange, conflicting news all the time that folks don't know where to place their bets. A conservative guy would be out of the markets right now. A smart one would be in; the question is whether to be long or short. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2168 Posts |
One thing for sure for me is PM in hand no other way
|
|
Valued Member
United States
410 Posts |
Quote: we are not immune being the big powerful USA to these simple laws of economy, and there have been others that simply did not recover as you also mentioned, and there aint no guarantee in paper I can promise that says we will not be the next..... I don't believe the US is immune. In fact I'm quite convinced that we are next. The power of the US is declining on the global stage and will continue to decline. Basic economics point to this fact as do demographics. The US has a small fraction of the world's population and that fraction is declining. The US share of global equity is also declining. As the US becomes a smaller fraction of the global market our economic influence will decline. As our economic influence declines our political influence will as well. This is why I made the statement above that investors need to be globally diversified. That is not only with investments but also with job skills. The current American worker is competing against a global talent pool. The 80's PM bubble: Yes the silver bubble was larger than the gold bubble. In my opinion, silver rose higher due to the bubble caused by the Hunt brother's market manipulations stacked on top of a general PM bubble. The underlying bubble, was not caused by market manipulation but fear. While I was alive during the late 70's / early 80's recession I wasn't old enough to understand it. However, from talking to my parents and others that lived through it, you had a general feeling of economic fear that was very similar to today. You had a recession, high unemployment, high oil prices, and a stock market that had ups and downs but had overall stayed flat for a decade. When people get scared they pull their money out of equities and put it in PM's. I believe the gold 1980's gold bubble was caused by economic fear not gold being pulled along with the Hunt brothers silver bubble due to gold / silver ratios. The Gold / Silver ratio: When our currency was backed by gold or silver the gold / silver ratio mattered. Now that the world's currencies are fiat, gold and silver are no longer tied. Gold is a commodity tied to economic moods. When the economy is going well, gold prices fall. When the economy falters we turn to gold as a safe reserve. On the other hand, silver is an industrial metal and prices are primarily driven by industrial use. That has changed in the last few years as gold prices rose enough to put gold out of reach of the average consumer and brokers realized that could make a killing with PM ETF based on futures. I don't see gold and silver's fates tied together today in a way that makes historical ratios matter in today's market.
|
| |
Replies: 107 / Views: 8,958 |
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use
|
| Coin Community Forum |
© 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums |
| It took 0.39 seconds to rattle this change. |
 |
|
| |
| |