I can't help but notice that many folks, even some in this thread, refer to these CC's, Coin Copies or Chinese Counterfeits, are "coins." IMHO, a big part of the problem is that these copies are labeled and even perceived by many collectors to be coins.
ebay classifies coins in many sub-categories, principally so by type. While grading is subjective, a coin's denomination, type and other aspects are objective, as is its authenticity. Is it then not unreasonable for anyone selling coins to have to declare it as genuine or else list it as a coin copy under a separate category like reproductions? Then, if a buyer looks at coins, these copies wouldn't even appear. Would such a move by
ebay not reduce the number of these incidents? What say you folks on this?
I agree that this 1831 listing is quite obvious, but other listings are not so. Sure, the buyer bears some responsibility, but
ebay listings like this 1831 are something of a trap for the less-informed collectors.