Quote:
It's not that there should be no role for religion and religious people in America, just that we were supposed to run civil discourse without it being a factor.
It's not that there should be no role for religion and religious people in America, just that we were supposed to run civil discourse without it being a factor.
Not quite - the motto was placed on our coins during a very different national mindset.
The idea behind the above quotation is a modern fallacy that has been taught through the liberal/pc school system now for quite some time. If you repeat something often enough, the people are going to believe it.
Regardless of peoples' personal desires/wants/beliefs, Taking the time to study the actual history (such as peoples' writings who were there) shows a position diametrically opposed to what is generally taught today.
The ten Commandments and other Biblical references are prominently found in legislative buildings, both state and federal (getting picky here - its not a federal government - it is a national government). Among other examples in D.C., the inside of the Washington monument has Bible versus all over inside it, the Library of Congress has statues of biblical people inside as prominent fixtures, and the sessions of Congress have always been started with prayer.
These kind of things were not done by a government body who thought you could divorce religion from government. The modern media/education system has pushed falsehoods by falsification of the facts. They claim and teach that "Separation of Church and State" is in the Constitution. Read it - the phrase is not there. They also teach those words meant that religion should be totally apart from government. The physical facts prove this to not be true.
The original idea behind the concept - in context - do some research - was that the government of the US could not establish a state religion and force people into that specific church. In fact immigrants to the US of the that time period understood the meaning to be freedom to worship in the manner they personally wanted without government oppression/coercion to conform to a government's standards of worship/church attendance etc.
So where are the seeds of the phrase on our coins?
At the start of the Civil War, Samuel Chase, the then US Sec. of Treasury said:
Quote:
Chase wrote in an 1861 letter to James Pollock, then Director of the Mint in Philadelphia, that "no nation can be strong except in the strength of God, or safe except in His defense. The trust of our people in God should be declared on our national coins."
Chase wrote in an 1861 letter to James Pollock, then Director of the Mint in Philadelphia, that "no nation can be strong except in the strength of God, or safe except in His defense. The trust of our people in God should be declared on our national coins."
courtesy of Wikipedia
Mr. Chase's government position is certainly indicative that "religion" was not to be divorced from government issues. We see a historical figure here affirms the previous items of architecture etc. found in D.C..
Quote:
Considering that In God We Trust was inserted as propaganda at the tail end of the Civil War
Considering that In God We Trust was inserted as propaganda at the tail end of the Civil War
After the Civil War it was not a propaganda of any sort - but welcomed by the majority of the people who had just gone through horrible times we cannot imagine. By definition, propaganda must have a deceitful nature to it to be classified as propaganda. No deceit was intended by the addition of the motto.
History (non-pc tainted, true history
In God we trust was a welcome statement in the newly (on paper) re-united country. There was a lot of trouble ahead, especially with reconstruction, however, the vast majority of people on both sides of the war, of their own free will, worshipped the God of the Bible. The statement was a constant reminder that in the end, if people continued with their mindset of trusting God, then the nation would once again be whole, healthy, and strong.
No, by all means, not everyone was a religious/Christian person. But it was a very hard thing to find people who did not at least acknowledge God (vs. other gods) - whether they wanted anything to do with religion or not. This changed in the early 60's when they decided kids did not need to be taught the 10 Commandments and a basic set of morals anymore. Welcome to the resultant society.
No, a religion is not to be dictated by government, but the people behind this motto being established on our money were doing it as a reminder that when Biblical morals (honesty, ethical treatments of fellow man, not murdering, not stealing, not lying, etc. etc.) are omitted from government, the nation rots from within.
Quote:
I'm indifferent on the "In God We Trust" bit (it just emphasizes how superstitious a nation we still are)
I'm indifferent on the "In God We Trust" bit (it just emphasizes how superstitious a nation we still are)
I am not insinuating you meant the term superstitious as a derogatory term. However, in light of history and science, the term superstition is a little out of context. But that is not for this forum.
It is to your credit you choose to accept differences of opinion rather than being hostile against them. This is what America is about.
Is my former life as a teacher showing again
How much squash could a Sasquatch squash if a Sasquatch would squash squash?
Download and read: Grading the graders
Costly TPG ineptitude and No FG Kennedy halves
https://ln5.sync.com/dl/7ca91bdd0/w...i3b-rbj9fir2
Download and read: Grading the graders
Costly TPG ineptitude and No FG Kennedy halves
https://ln5.sync.com/dl/7ca91bdd0/w...i3b-rbj9fir2

























