| Author |
 Replies: 12 / Views: 1,897 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
987 Posts |
I bought a batch of bullion silver coins yesterday and most of them were smoothies. The following two coins however still have discernible dates. The 1915 10 cents is a key date and the 1883 25 cents would fill a hole in my collection. I'm torn on whether to send them to the melting pot or keep them. What would you do? Note: I didn't post the obverses as they are just as bad.   |
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
14463 Posts |
I say keep them. As you said, one is a key date, the other would fill a hole in your collection.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
1119 Posts |
the 3 seems awfully low compared to the other numbers
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
987 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
United States
14463 Posts |
the 3 does look a little low, but your picture is not totally straight. The H mint mark should be directly at 6'oclock
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
987 Posts |
I have a picture with the mint mark directly at the bottom but it just seems to make the 1 look low as well as the 3. With a coin that's struggling to make a Fr 2 grade I wonder if it's the amount of wear that makes the numbers look out of place?  Edited by Peter4805
03/10/2012 06:24 am
|
|
Valued Member
United States
114 Posts |
 Keep or trade, but I just want to keep everything  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
I am never happy with coins in less then fine condition, or coins that have obvious damage, unless they are very rare.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
115 Posts |
If you can read a date on Victorian, Edward VII, or Geo. V coins then it's collectible to somebody, not for melt.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
I say, if it fills a hole in your album, then it it a great coin.  Most early Canadian coins have been circulated so much they are in this condition, still I'd keep it.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
576 Posts |
When I was a kid trying to earn some pocket money delivering the Telegram in the early sixties, I got the collecting bug. And I can still remember how hard it was to get a George V or earlier silver coin with a full reverse on it in change. I still use what I learned then in my collecting now. Based on a coin's condition I try to guess when it last saw circulation. The 1915 dime here certainly could have been used to buy a coke or chips by some kid in the fifties. It's obviously survived decades in circulation. The 1883 quarter here also likely saw use in the 1950's. I remember saving all the Victorian silver I got in change then or that I bought when turned in at scout meeting collections. None had dates. But I marvelled I could still get these in pocket change then.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
987 Posts |
I was a kid back in the sixties as well. I remember getting the odd Victoria and Edward coins, and lots George V. Like you I found that most of them were worn dateless. One thing I found odd was that I hardly ever found any George V cents or nickels in circulation. I only ever found a handful that were older than 1937.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
576 Posts |
Peter, you're right. I think I found more Buffalo nickels in change than George V nickels. And I remember trying to locate 1948 nickels and dimes. Even then it was obvious they were being busily removed from circulation. I got a few 1948 nickels but I never did find a dime. And I worked at it. |
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,897 |
|
Posted 03/10/2012 05:26 am
