I guess I just prefer the tougher standards. If I didn't get a significant price reduction for a weakly struck UNC, I wouldn't buy it. I'm very annoyed by the description of RAM packaged NCLT being described as UNC just because it hasn't been passed from hand to hand when there are all sorts of nicks, bag marks, dings etc. on most examples. The Queen's cheekbones especially come in for a hammering.
This might be alright for a new circulation coin obtained over the counter at a bank but not for packaged commemoratives for which we pay a hefty mark-up over face value. In fact in my opinion there is something wrong with the grading when in some instances I can get a better example of a circulation coin from the bank than one that is specially packaged.
My local coin dealer expects me to go through his entire stock searching for the best examples but at Downies they were quite shocked & seemed a little offended when I did this. However, it's a case of "if this isn't acceptable to you I can always purchase it elsewhere."
But I don't mind you classifying my coins less stringently.