Quote:
Initially, they were Postage Currency, which was essentially a paper money equivalent of stamps, complete with pix of the stamps of their face value.
Initially, they were Postage Currency, which was essentially a paper money equivalent of stamps, complete with pix of the stamps of their face value.
Yes, you are exactly right. I have an example in my stamp collection because the first issue utilized images of stamps and are considered (by philatelists) as stamps used as money. The second issue and beyond are considered by philatelists to be more paper money than stamp. Some day I may revisit that area to learn more.
Quote:
If you change your mind about going back on proofs, you might consider 1959 (all the LMC) or 1955 (first year of the new packaging for proof sets, similar to mint sets).
If you change your mind about going back on proofs, you might consider 1959 (all the LMC) or 1955 (first year of the new packaging for proof sets, similar to mint sets).
I am going back to 1959 (first LMC) with the mint sets, so it's just a question of whether I want to also include the proof sets for '59 through '64 since there were no proofs from '65 to '67. If I understand you correctly, you are advocating that if I do decide to include proof sets as well then I may want to go back a few years further (to 1955) so that I would have a complete run of every proof set in the current packaging. Interesting point!























