Quote:
I doubt it - either they would come forward with all of them or just one. What would you do if you had them - why risk even half of these coins when you know that you cant prove how you got them? Why even risk a few? If you're going to test the waters you might as well risk the minimum with just one, and then deal with the others later.
It would all depend on how many I had. If I had two Id come forward with 1. If I had 15 I probably would try with 10 to get a the HUGE amount of money they bring and keep a couple or 1 or 2 just in case its denied.
Quote:
First of all though, they shouldn't have even thought that the Farouk coin set any kind of precedent for them and their coins. That coin was seized even though it was originally GIVEN away by the government as a gift! They still wanted it destroyed very badly. Only after a lot of resistance did they eventually legalize it... and the only reason was that they knew the coin was obtained fairly. It's clearly a very different case, for very relevant reasons.
Im sure they knew it was a risk, but with a potential of 15-20+ million if you win, its definitely worth the risk. The higher the reward the bigger the risk will take and the potential gain here is huge. I know a lot of us say we would have just kept them all, but unless youre already rich once one got legalized it did set a precedent for the coins being allowed. Its hard to just sit on potential millions if you dont already have millions.
Quote:
I'm not saying who I think should get the coins, I'm just saying that this family should have realized they were going to have to prove how they got them. You have something that was created by the government, locked in a secure facility the whole time, and then later ordered by the government to be completely destroyed. In this specific situation it's just really hard to argue that it's actually legitimately yours when you can't prove it. You can't just say "BUT THEY'RE MINE!"... lol
I dont think it was ever in question who the coins belonged to, the question was whether or not the coins should be allowed to exist at all where ownership wouldnt matter.
But like I said above I'm sure the family knew that it was a risk they were taking, but with the potential outcome Id say it was definitely worth a shot. At the very least I'm sure they kept 1 as a family keep sake