Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
300,000 items to help build your collection! Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin Auctions








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1964 Proof , Wrong Reverse ?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 816Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
InfiniteInterest's Avatar
United States
673 Posts
 Posted 12/31/2007  8:21 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add InfiniteInterest to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I was cataloging some coins today when I came across a Washington quarter proof single. Noticeably proof surfaces, not cameo but a nice brilliant proof. When I looked at the reverse I expected to see the "Type B Reverse" as all proofs from that era (1956-64) were struck with ( As far as I know ).


The pics are not the greatest since they are my first proof coin pics but If you have seen a proof reverse on any 1960's proof quarter, the difference should be apparent. There is no large space between the E and S in states , and the leaf tip does not go above the arrow tip, and feather detail is very weak.

So....what could this be ? IMO this reverse is the regular business strike reverse for 1964. The feather detail and other details do not indicate it could be an SMS (not a type C)
I toyed with the idea that it could be a whizzed coin, but I see no indication that it has been cleaned, I will get it under a scope next week when my B&M opens back up. Until then I would like to hear you opinions on this.

1964-Proof-,-Wrong-Reverse-?



1964-Proof-,-Wrong-Reverse-?
Pillar of the Community
Metalman's Avatar
United States
7123 Posts
 Posted 12/31/2007  11:48 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Metalman to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Is it possible to get pics of the whole reverse of the coin .

Its interesting and I would like to see all of the details .

Metalman

Pillar of the Community
InfiniteInterest's Avatar
United States
673 Posts
 Posted 01/01/2008  01:11 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add InfiniteInterest to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'll give it a shot tomorrow Metalman, taking pictures of a proof coin is proving to be difficult to say the least. I am going to visit the photography forum and see if I can find some tips there.
Pillar of the Community
InfiniteInterest's Avatar
United States
673 Posts
 Posted 01/01/2008  6:59 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add InfiniteInterest to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Well, after more study I have decided not to do this New Years Eve again ! Being in a hurry to get going after I found this coin I didn't really look that closely at it. After more scrutiny I now believe this coin to be a whizzed 1964-P business strike coin. Here is a pic of the entire reverse .

In hand the letters have just the slightest rounding to them , not nice and square like a proof should be, you probably cannot tell this from the pic .You can see all the chest feather details , which made me think no whiz, but the details are a bit to soft I think. The reflectivity is such that I cannot get a decent picture without too much glare, the obverse has proved impossible so far. Any opinions are welcome, but I think I answered my own question.




1964-Proof-,-Wrong-Reverse-?
Pillar of the Community
foundinrolls's Avatar
United States
3507 Posts
 Posted 01/02/2008  12:32 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add foundinrolls to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hard to tell from the pics. could be lightly plated. I'm just throwing that in as something to think about. I really just can't tell.

That being said, the edge doesn't have the sharp edge that you would expect to see on a proof coin.
Edited by foundinrolls
01/02/2008 12:35 am
  Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 816Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.32 seconds to rattle this change. Forums