| Author |
Replies: 24 / Views: 2,501 |
|
Valued Member
United States
291 Posts |
Edited by 40Proof 09/05/2016 9:06 pm
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3210 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5689 Posts |
If those are just frost breaks on the cheek rather than bag marks, I'd say at least MS-63. The surfaces look nice.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36906 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
457 Posts |
Obverse MS61 DPL, reverse looks like MS65/66 DPL quality, may squeeze out a MS63 DPL, but certainly a solid MS62 DPL.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3516 Posts |
MS 62 PL, might slide at a 63 pl
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
Agree with the 63PL and possibly DMPL crowd
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18729 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
291 Posts |
Thanks. I added a couple of pics to my initial post. There are 12-inch mirrors on the obverse and 8-inch mirrors on the reverse, so I'm confident it would pass the DMPL threshold.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4473 Posts |
MS63PL - The coin may not have enough contrast to go DMPL.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
291 Posts |
We'll see, Slider. Just shipped it off today. I think it has enough contrast...pics just aren't great. I'll let everyone know when I get it back.
|
| |
Replies: 24 / Views: 2,501 |