| Author |
Replies: 100 / Views: 15,697 |
|
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
458 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1463 Posts |
Not very happy about the design selection.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
413 Posts |
I will certainly pick up a set at some point to add the SD, Loonie and Twoonie to their respective collections, but hoping I will be able to find the individual coins reasonably priced somewhere so I can save a bit by not buying the whole set... 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
2984 Posts |
The problem with many of the designs is they look like they were done by a bunch of amateurs, which unfortunately is the case. All of the designs were from people that are non-professionals.
They should have used a single artist like the renown artist Alex Colville that did the 1967 designs. So they would have an uniform design instead of the mishmash of themes we now have.
Edited by MoneyPenney 11/15/2016 03:34 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5324 Posts |
Idea is great but the chosen designs were poor, just too mush political correctness
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1027 Posts |
@john100
You nailed it on the head. "too much political correctness"
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6768 Posts |
Like we designs or don't, we will buy, since it one-year appearance for the Canada anniversary, not the overpriced set, but something simpler - base metal Proof set for example. Does RCM plan to distribute the "special wrap roll" for all the coins, or even "Roll set"?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2845 Posts |
Choice of design aside - - so hopping over to the other side of the fence, ANY year of variation from the norm is a good thing.
It catches the attention of our youth and generates interest in those who will become collectors of tomorrow.
For those who buy NCLT for the sake of their children, however a misguided notion or not but whatever, this set with coins that circulated within their lifetime is probably far more meaningful than a big coin anniversary of a year long before they were born.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
2984 Posts |
Quote: Choice of design aside - - so hopping over to the other side of the fence, ANY year of variation from the norm is a good thing.
It catches the attention of our youth and generates interest in those who will become collectors of tomorrow.
I can guarantee you these coins will NOT catch the attention of our youth because they are not into coin collecting the way kids were in the 1960's. When I grew up in the 60's, coin and stamp collecting was very big. There were a lot of coin and stamp stores around. Even department stores had a coin and stamp department. Back in the 1960's there were no computers, no video games, no cell phones. Most had black and white tvs. None of the electronic toys kids love today. Simply said, kids will care less about these coins. Just too many other distractions. The other important thing to note is the variation from the norm. There is too much of it already. The Mint comes out with several different loonies, twonies, and quarters every year. Just lookin at the coins on my desk, I have a lucky loonie Battle of the Atlantic $2, a wait for daddy coin, a poppy quarter, a Secord quarter, a Brock quarter, a and lots of Olympic quarters. Sometimes I get more special issue coins than regular coins in my change. Back in the 1967, it was much different since most of the coins except for the dollar were the same every year for decades and suddenly there were different designs.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
261 Posts |
Yeah  , I think Moneypenny nailed it.
|
|
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
 United States
12322 Posts |
Just noticed that the RCM changed the ship date for the proof set from December 6, 2016 to February 10, 2017. I wonder what the issue is...A problem producing one or more of the coins? A packaging issue?
Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1027 Posts |
Maybe they will change the designs? Who knows what RCM is thinking.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2845 Posts |
Quote:
I can guarantee you these coins will NOT catch the attention of our youth because they are not into coin collecting the way kids were in the 1960's
Coin collecting is definitely not as popular now as in the '60s and its likely to continue the downward slide. In all fairness, I don't recall kids collecting coin in the 60s, it was mostly older folk, parents and grandparents who demonstrated their collection fever with avid and keen interest. But it's the memories that can become important years later. I recall my dad explaining to me what each of the animals symbolized but at the time it didn't make any sense to me. Will kids will care a less about the 150th circulation coins? I suppose it depends on us adults and how important or not we view Canada's 150th anniversary and the special coin. I don't especially like it either and it wouldn't have been my choice, but that's not going to dampen my enthusiasms because it's not about me,. I intend on hoping to make it a memorable year for my grandson, maybe we'll see if we can accumulate 150 2017 coins by the end of the year (he's only 10). Quote:Just noticed that the RCM changed the ship date for the proof set from December 6, 2016 to February 10, 2017. I wonder what the issue is...A problem producing one or more of the coins? A packaging issue? Just my opinion but I thought it really weird for RCM to ship 2017 Proof anniversary coin in 2016, prior to the mintng and release of the circulation coin. Maybe someone of influence doesn't want RCM stealing the thunder. It wouldn't surprise me if the official release of the circulation coin involves celebrations including the PM, the respective artists and lots of selfies.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2845 Posts |
|
|
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
 United States
12322 Posts |
Quote:Just my opinion but I thought it really weird for RCM to ship 2017 Proof anniversary coin in 2016, prior to the minting and release of the circulation coin. Agree completely. From the first announcement of the set, I have wondered why a December release and not a January - the typical month of release for the annual proof set. When it ships, it ships. It doesn't make a bit of difference to me when I receive the set I ordered.
Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
|
| |
Replies: 100 / Views: 15,697 |