| Author |
 Replies: 182 / Views: 23,223 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3479 Posts |
Quote:MikeF, Did you have any luck with the TPG? No, I wanted to view it again in hand first. Just got it back today. I haven't seen the coin in 3 months thanks to the dip stick dealer. Thanks for the contact info, bro! I'll deal with NGC on Monday. If anyone can point out any evidence of cleaning, please chime in. |
|
Moderator
 United States
188770 Posts |
I am not seeing it. Looks solid to me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
824 Posts |
I agree, I am not seeing anything to make it a details. This is another reason why I am holding off on sending in the questionable 1854 O Half.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Quote:
If anyone can point out any evidence of cleaning, please chime in. They're likely saying the toning is a result of an old cleaning. I still don't see it being details worthy but that's likely why they did aside from the fact the coin was in a terrible submission |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3058 Posts |
I see no evidence of cleaning at all.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
The toning on the coin may be a result of a cleaning.
An inspection by PCGS is warranted. If they give the coin a Details grade, then it has most likely been cleaned. If not, then most likely NGC was in error.
Edited by SilverDollar2017
02/18/2018 5:11 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1788 Posts |
Another reason as to buy the coin, not the holder.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3479 Posts |
Quote:
The toning on the coin may be a result of a cleaning.
An inspection by PCGS is warranted. If they give the coin a Details grade, then it has most likely been cleaned. If not, then most likely NGC was in error. Silver dollar: You are quickly gaining a reputation of being the master of the obvious. And repeating it multiple times per thread. Strive for quality, not quantity in your posts. My question was with the new zoomed in pics, do you see any evidence of cleaning? Edited by MikeF
02/18/2018 6:42 pm
|
|
Valued Member
240 Posts |
She's a thing of beauty. Nicely done!
|
|
Moderator
United States
15446 Posts |
Wishing you the best on re-submittal ... looks solid to me and it always has ... one of the most beautiful CBH to ever grace this forum.  Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1261 Posts |
I personally don't think it warrants a details cleaned or AT holder.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4211 Posts |
I hope you get this resolved Mike.
I am no expert on this series however like others
I see no reason at all for a details grade.
It's a stunning coin!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7840 Posts |
I wonder how fast NGC will process this coin through their system?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3479 Posts |
Quote:
I wonder how fast NGC will process this coin through their system? There's no hurry. I haven't sent it back in yet, not even sure if I will but thanks for bumping this post back up. I was going to share an example of TPG arrogance that my friend Greg experienced on the seated forums. I asked him for an update on a 71 sld he purchased awhile ago. It was graded ms-61 when he purchased it from Great Collections but clearly looked like a 58. After nearly a year of back and forth with PCGS he finally gave us an update. @Baseball you in particular might find it very interesting. https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/sea...t-t5601.html @admins, I hope it's ok to link to another forum. I asked for permission but never heard back. I think everyone here can learn something from this. Edited by MikeF
02/26/2018 4:49 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Quote:There's no hurry. I haven't sent it back in yet, not even sure if I will but thanks for bumping this post back up. I was going to share an example of TPG arrogance that my friend Greg experienced on the seated forums. I asked him for an update on a 71 sld he purchased awhile ago. It was graded ms-61 when he purchased it from Great Collections but clearly looked like a 58. After nearly a year of back and forth with PCGS he finally gave us an update. @Baseball you in particular might find it very interesting. I saw his post on CU. I have to say that at the moment I am a little skeptical of the details of the story from his reaction when someone had asked to see full slab shots of it in both holders. I'm not sure why he was unwilling to do that. On the other hand though, I am not at all surprised things are downgrading right now with how conservative grading went around the new year. It almost seems like someone convinced the TPGs that people wanted ultra conservative grading and they decided to experiment with it. Edited by basebal21
02/26/2018 9:11 pm
|
| |
Replies: 182 / Views: 23,223 |
First Page
Previous Page
Posted 02/18/2018 12:08 am
