| Author |
Replies: 875 / Views: 78,252 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4901 Posts |
Good points about protection and storage. Definitely easier to store a NGC or PCGS box of 20 slabs than 20 OGP boxes and they make it easier to see the coin... The 25th Annie ASE OGP was perfect for both. Five slabs fit in the box and created a great presentation case...same with a couple of the two coin sets that followed.
Edited by Foxwoods Man 03/17/2019 09:53 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1913 Posts |
I prefer the OGP capsules over slabs because they feel more like you're holding a coin, though the slabs do offer significantly more protection. I put my uncs in airtites which are just as good as the slabs as far as protection goes, but also have that coin like feel. The thing that I dislike most about the slabs is the great variety of labels. It's very difficult to start and finish a series without the 3rd party grading services changing the labels or the slabs themselves.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4901 Posts |
The labels only change if you decide to buy different labels. If you collect PCGS FS or NGC ER (or not) then they are reasonably consistent..
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Quote:I believe TPG Service registries are the reason there is a high demand for 70 graded coins... Gotta keep up with your fellow registry competitors. There's no where near the number of registries compared to the demand. People give registries FAR to much credit. A lot of people just like having the best which is a 70 and it really is that simple especially with the new issues where the 70s don't have massive premiums anymore. Quote:- TPG slabs typically offer better storage protection than OGP - TPG slabs are much less bulky than OGP and are easier to store - Most OGP coins are not 70s, even when received new, directly from the Mint Not to mention some of the OGP is actually destructive to the coins long term
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1044 Posts |
Quote: Not to mention some of the OGP is actually destructive to the coins long term Interesting, how so?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Quote: Interesting, how so? Check out some of the older products as a good example like the brown box Ikes or the mint cello sets. It's not uncommon to have to MS 70 or dip a coin that comes out of some of these packaging methods to get it back to looking fresh. There's been other instances where if the coin capsule came lose ASEs would tone etc. The packaging in general in some of the products is just destructive long term to what it contains. The hard part when talking about really old OGP is balancing whether to remove the coins or keep the packing premium. There are some really old OGP were even with less than attractive coins they're worth more left alone than removed
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5611 Posts |
Baseball, I have been collecting since 1963, I collect ALL OGP'G material and then some. Your comments are again, Your Opinions. You have been placing comments that others have clearly stated should say, and have asked you to say, are my opinions, and here You state that TPG'S protect coins better than the Original Government Packaging. That is Your opinion, I am in total disagreement with that view. I see them as fumbling with the optimum preservation of the coins, My Opinion.I know that people pay better than good money for their grade opinions, During those times, In My Opinion, they do not use the proper ' what's best for the coin safety measures " Your opinion and mine are different, only I treat you as you should be, with respect and good manners. Your way of highlighting people's remarks then going about to tell all why they are wrong is not kind or friendly. Although I have been around this forum for a Very long time and it seems what's not acceptable for one is clearly acceptable for " other's ".........PS, Could You try to mention that the remarks You give are ' in Your opinion '..... Thanks
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5611 Posts |
Baseball, Do not misunderstand me, I am NOT being rude, I see You also stated that " Most OGP coins are not 70s, even when received new, directly from the Mint ". Really, Where do the ms-70's come from? That IN MY OPINION is better than a silly and foolish comment,  The mint has the best merchandise available to receive a perfect coin. Are You saying the Mint has more defects then not or ? I am not sure what You're saying IF I am wrong, Could You please explain, MD...
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Quote:Baseball, I have been collecting since 1963, I collect ALL OGP'G material and then some. Your comments are again, Your Opinions. You have been placing comments that others have clearly stated should say, and have asked you to say, are my opinions, and here You state that TPG'S protect coins better than the Original Government Packaging. That is Your opinion That's actually a fact. Hazing on brown box Ikes is a well known issue. So is mint cello destroying coins over time. It doesn't happen to every coin but it happens enough to be a known issue just like milk spot spotting which is a mint issue. If you have never experienced any of that you certainly have been lucky Quote: During those times, In My Opinion, they do not use the proper ' what's best for the coin safety measures " They handle coins properly. Quote: Your way of highlighting people's remarks then going about to tell all why they are wrong is not kind or friendly Information isn't always friendly. Social events are supposed to be friendly or a happy hour get together. Factual information is just exactly that factual. Knowledge and education should be the most important part when discussing issues Quote: Most OGP coins are not 70s, even when received new, directly from the Mint ". Really, Where do the ms-70's come from? That IN MY OPINION is better than a silly and foolish comment, Read that again. First I wasn't the one who said it, rather I quoted it. But it is still true. 70s come from the mint, but again read it again. He was saying a significant percentage of what the mint issues would not be a 70 which is absolutely true. The quality control issues of the mint overall are well documented and from what I have seen and in this case my opinion the quality of the US mint over all is lagging behind several world mints. There's a reason why the big sellers looking for a lot of 70s buy massive quantities to get what they need, if most or almost all of the mint products were 70s their purchases would be much smaller. Quote: The mint has the best merchandise available to receive a perfect coin. Actually people selling graded 70s have the best merchandise available to get a perfect coin. If someone wants a perfect one get it from someone selling a 70. You can roll the dice with the mint, but it is exactly that a gamble
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4901 Posts |
I think the point with "to get a perfect coin" related to aftermarket sellers of OGP coins....the Mint has is all over the below cost dealers in OGP coins...obviously dealers with already graded 70's would be the best source to get, well.. "duh", a 70
Edited by Foxwoods Man 03/17/2019 5:32 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1913 Posts |
Though I do agree that some of the OGP had damaged proofs over time, far more proofs are damaged by improper handling. This can happen at the mint, but more likely it's after the coins leave the mint. Dealers, collectors and yes, even 3rd party graders have damaged coins. The primary reason for the damage is that these people just are not following the known best practices necessary to prevent damage to a coin. Though some modern proofs in OGP have spotted directly from the mint, most spots are caused post mint by people breathing over bare coins, touching them with bare hands or improper storage. If people just wore masks and quality cotton disposable gloves, most of these spots wouldn't happen. These are simple best practices that everyone should follow.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Quote: Though some modern proofs in OGP have spotted directly from the mint, most spots are caused post mint by people breathing over bare coins, touching them with bare hands or improper storage. Most spots happen from minting issues. Milk spotting is by FAR the most common cause of spotting. Packing is the second most common Quote: . If people just wore masks and quality cotton disposable gloves, most of these spots wouldn't happen. These are simple best practices that everyone should follow. They're how you want to handle your coins which is fine. They also do very little unless you have a head cap on as well as a sterile suit as the things you think you are preventing can come from anywhere on your body and your dandruff can stick to the gloves. That doesn't even get into how the room has to be turned into a clean room as well. Point being if someone believes masks and gloves are necessary even though gloves do more harm than good, then they should be consistent and go all out eliminating all the other environmental and human body factors
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1913 Posts |
Quote: Most spots happen from minting issues. Milk spotting is by FAR the most common cause of spotting. Packing is the second most common I'm not talking about milk spots. I'm talking about the black spots that sometimes develop on proofs. I've had US proofs in OGP that developed a haze as time passed, but have never had a US coin that developed a milk spot. I have seen them on foreign coins though. I've been collecting since the early '80's. Quote: Point being if someone believes masks and gloves are necessary even though gloves do more harm than good, then they should be consistent and go all out eliminating all the other environmental and human body factors While most collectors and dealers don't have the means to have an HVAC system that scrubs particulates from the air and keeps humidity to a low level, the mint and 3rd party graders absolutely should have these systems in place. It would be interesting to know to what extent they do. I've heard nothing from the 3rd party grading services in this regard. I'd think that if they had such systems in place, they'd make a point to advertise it. Perhaps they have and I missed it. Please take no offense, but your claim that "gloves do more harm than good" is just patently absurd. I've been using good quality disposable cotton gloves for years and have never once seen an ill effect. In fact, I've never even heard someone make a claim that a coin was damaged by gloves. I'm not saying that it can't happen as people can screw up anything. I've seem plenty of coins with dark areas around the edges where oils remained after someone held a coin by the rim, not to mention the black spots caused by moisture droplets. When I was putting together my ASE collection, I looked at a plethora of ASE's that had dark spots around the rim caused by holding them with bare fingers. Exposure of proofs is risky. I think that people should follow best practices to reduce the odds.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5611 Posts |
What would anyone here say if I were to say, Give me a " pr-70 or an MS-70 Graded by a TPG'R and I will find a defect..... I will not debate the previous claims, as I do not agree. People place, IN MY OPINION, too much weight in a slabbed coin...... Love the OGP'D coins from the mint  ...PS, My head scratch emoji was because I do not see eye to eye on this topic, I agree to disagree..... Be Nice !!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1913 Posts |
I think that one of the funniest things about 3rd party graded coins is that there is such a lack of confidence in the grades given, there is now 4th party grading. CAC is 4th party for classics and MAC is 4th party of moderns.
|
| |
Replies: 875 / Views: 78,252 |