| Author |
 Replies: 12 / Views: 2,227 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3656 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1005 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4963 Posts |
Quote:
1877  I wish I had that kind of luck. Looks like a 71 to me. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7648 Posts |
Date - 1878; Value - Not much; Grade - damaged/cull
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Not 1877, wrong reverse.
Not 1871, which had a curved date logo.
1874 and 1876 are possibilities.
Value in any event - virtually worthless.
Edited by Coinfrog
02/25/2019 7:26 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4963 Posts |
Quote:
Not 1871, which had a curved date logo. Good to know. In that case my money's on 1874 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
747 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8521 Posts |
I'm guessing 1874
Oregon coin geek.....*** GO BEAVS ! ! ! ***
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4963 Posts |
Please excuse my lousy drawing, which I did with the touchpad on my laptop in bed, but hopefully this conveys the idea.   The 7 and 4 look close together, but compare it to this:  |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3656 Posts |
Thank you all so much for your time and expertise. Didn't realize the significance of some of these dates until I started looking them up from your replies. Yes, indeed an 1877 would pretty much have been a miracle. An 1871 would have been really nice too - except then I would have been disappointed in it's condition. Numisma - Thanks a bunch for that drawing - better than mine would have been. Coinfrog: The only one I didn't figure out was Quote:
Not 1877, wrong reverse. I was looking at V.V. which is normally where I look up my LC's for the designs on the Indian Heads but couldn't find anything. Is there a website like VV that has them? You're the best  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
The regular issue 1877 reverse was struck with the old Shallow N reverse, which hadn't been used since 1872 and was never used again. Only the Proof issue of this year has the Bold N reverse (like yours), and this is most unlikely to have been a Proof strike.
Edited by Coinfrog
02/26/2019 08:59 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3656 Posts |
thanks - I really appreciate the info  |
|
Valued Member
United States
59 Posts |
"The regular issue 1877 reverse was struck with the old Shallow N reverse, which hadn't been used since 1872 and was never used again. Only the Proof issue of this year has the Bold N reverse (like yours), and this is most unlikely to have been a Proof strike."
This is exactly correct. My first impression from the photos is that you have an 1874.
Sean
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 2,227 |
|
Posted 02/25/2019 5:35 pm
