| Author |
Replies: 7,432 / Views: 399,197 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Australia
2570 Posts |
Zeno -extended search- MAMLUK Date min 818 -Date max 818 ..a matching AH818 coin on Zeno has a reference number Balog N/5. I don't think the sellers reference of 'left hand coin 4-5 o'clock' is helpful. Can any of the experts weigh in?
The Ox moves slowly, but the Earth is patient.
Edited by ttkoo 01/07/2024 4:14 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Russian Federation
5181 Posts |
Turns out it's likely that the arrows are in fact pointing at the units figure of the date - but it's in words, not in digits? Cf. Zeno 73702, see bottom comment for legend translation. I don't know remotely enough Arabic to have any idea if that makes sense. Kushanshah might know better. This type should be Album 992 if I'm reading the description of Zeno 115617 correctly.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Australia
2570 Posts |
Quote: Turns out it's likely that the arrows are in fact pointing at the units figure of the date - but it's in words, not in digits? Cf. Zeno 73702, see bottom comment for legend translation.
I don't know remotely enough Arabic to have any idea if that makes sense. Kushanshah might know better.
This type should be Album 992 if I'm reading the description of Zeno 115617 correctly. @J1M, thanks for that information.....the plot thickens! edit: I posed the question on Zeno. Alex responded that it is 818 https://www.zeno.ru/showphoto.php?photo=326590Album 992 Balog N5 So who has 1414AD?
The Ox moves slowly, but the Earth is patient.
Edited by ttkoo 01/08/2024 05:49 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Russian Federation
5181 Posts |
Quote: So who has 1414AD? According to my list... erafjel? Quote: 1414 - erafjel 1413 - erafjel 1412 - JohnConduitt 1411 - Spence, augustus1 1410 (AH 813) - none found (I added one coin that I didn't originally list because I hadn't checked the thread it was in.) I think we got all the way here almost entirely through the efforts of Spence, tdziemia, EddieDiz, and bd251 (with the exception of a few Grinya posts and my 1452 coin), but now we need to turn to some other members. It's going to be interesting.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7968 Posts |
Onward! (I've now got a 1411, but nothing between).
|
|
Moderator
  United States
190135 Posts |
Excellent!  We Need - 1414 C. E. (A. H. 817) - 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Sweden
2124 Posts |
I do have a 1414 coin (and a 1413, for later). But it requires a bit of argumentation to make it 1414. The issue is that the royal ordonnance specifying the new type of gros, with lower silver content than the previous one, was issued Nov 3, 1413, so in reference works this coin is dated 1413 (and Numista lists it as 1413-1414). However, that date does not mean that minting began on the morning of Nov 4. First, an order to manufacture coins must be issued. In the case of Rouen, which is the mint for my coin, that order was issued Dec 8, 1413. That was the day the king (or perhaps his secretary) dictated the order to the royal scribe. That hand written order had to be copied, by hand, for all who needed it. Maybe that takes just one day, so we have Dec 9. Rouen is about 140 km from Paris, where the king sits. The order has to be sent by use of a horseman, who in wintertime can not be expected to travel more than 30 km a day, so the trip to Rouen takes five days. The mint master in Rouen will in best case receive the order Dec 14 and act on it Dec 15. Removing at least two Sundays, it is only 7 work days left until Christmas Eve, which marks the start of the Twelve Days of Christmas, during which no work is performed by any good men. There is no way that dies will be made ready and production started in such a short time. So under all reasonable assumptions, minting of these coins can start earliest Jan 1414! Add to that, that this is a single issue (no more manufacturing orders issued), which means that when the requested number of coins have been minted, no more are made. And starting in January, that end point will surely happen during 1414. (Numista even states demonetization to take place in June 1414.) For this to work, we have to ignore that according to French custom at this time, the year began at Easter, so in their view, 1413 lasted until April 1414 in a modern calendar . . .  But I think we should take an external view, since we are neither in France (most of us) nor in Medieval times (none of us), and use the modern reckoning. France 1414, gros "aux lis sous une couronne", Rouen. Duplessy 384A. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Russian Federation
5181 Posts |
From my original comment on the Walking Back By Decades thread... Quote: Note that I assigned @erafjel's Dec 1413-June 1414 emission to the year 1414, as the vast majority of the apparent minting period is in that year. At the time I assumed that the Dec 8th date was the actual beginning of production rather than just the decree permitting such. In any case, though, it looks like the minting period was 1) less than a year and 2) mostly or entirely in 1414, which classifies this as a 1414 coin for this thread.
|
|
Moderator
  United States
190135 Posts |
Thank you for that explanation. It is very interesting!  J1M seems to agree it works for 1414. So if there are no objections, we can move on to 1413!  I will wait until I get at least one more affirmation to change the title.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Australia
2570 Posts |
Quote: I will wait until I get at least one more affirmation to change the title . erafjel's argument is compelling. I am convinced. (It was also interesting for me to read about Charles VI, and the mental health issues which plagued him and assisted in shaping the future of France.)
The Ox moves slowly, but the Earth is patient.
|
|
Moderator
  United States
190135 Posts |
Okay then!  We Need - 1413 C. E. (A. H. 816) - 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34450 Posts |
This is an interesting discussion @era and @j1m. I have a similar Gros (below), attributed as Duplessy 384. I had the date range on this one as 1413 to 1422 AD as that end date coincides with Charles VI's end of reign and I had no later coin of this specification to pin an earlier end date on. Do you all think that the difference between our two coins is one of minting location rather than time period? Thx for your input!  
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7968 Posts |
If struck in Paris, there is no horseman riding to Rouen with a copy of the ordonance.  I think my coin of 1422 (Holland) might have been a similar instance. Mostly it is cited as "emission of 1422," but j1m found a respected Dutch seller who had it as 1423. Probably a dive in to van der Chijs would reveal the date of the ordonance.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Sweden
2124 Posts |
Quote: I have a similar Gros (below), attributed as Duplessy 384. I had the date range on this one as 1413 to 1422 AD Quote: If struck in Paris, there is no horseman riding to Rouen with a copy of the ordonance. My best guess is that Spence's coin is indeed struck in Paris. It lacks the "secret" point under the initial "+" before SIT that should be there for Paris, but Paris also put a small clover before G in GROSVS, and there is a tiny feature there - it looks more like a small cross, but no other mints (should) put anything there. The Paris mint may have had opportunity to begin minting during 1413, I think. However, they would cease minting this type of coin in June 1414, when a decree ordered all mints to halt minting these coins until further notice.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Sweden
2124 Posts |
Here is my 1413 coin. No doubts here, a single issue beginning June 1413, ending November same year, when it was replaced by my and Spence's 1413-1414 coin. France 1413, gros "aux lis", Rouen. Duplessy 381. 
|
| |
Replies: 7,432 / Views: 399,197 |