| Author |
 Replies: 50 / Views: 4,142 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1048 Posts |
You'll never guess what PCGS says about this one:   |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2971 Posts |
Hmm, let me guess Uncirculated details, genuine, environmental damage... (My straight grade, MS-61 details)...  |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1048 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5838 Posts |
 It's a Proof! Edited by macmercury
12/01/2021 9:31 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
I'm going to say they called it PR64, and given it's in an older holder it developed the ED after it was slabbed. Now a Details example. Edit: Ahhh macmercury beat me to it  Edited by Ty2020b
12/01/2021 9:35 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7646 Posts |
It's a proof that has deteriorated over the years in its plastic coffin.
PF66 would not surprise me one bit!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'll say MS details (ED). Awful looking coin.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10048 Posts |
I agree with proof - my first thoughts also.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3848 Posts |
PF-63, there are a handful dings and bumps on Miss Liberty.
Suffering from bust half fever. Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: http://goccf.com/t/434955Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
I note that there are no plastic coin support claws around the diameter of the coin.
That suggests to me that the coin pictured is not slabbed.
Was this coin pictured in this way before it was submitted to PCGS?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2287 Posts |
sel- It's in an older holder, possibly OGH, they didn't have the plastic coin support claws.
You realize when you know how to think, it empowers you far beyond those who know only what to think.
-Neil deGrasse Tyson
Edited by NumismaticsFTW
12/01/2021 11:32 pm
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
Head scratcher  . This coin IMHO could not have been sent to PCGS in it's present condition . I'm at odds  |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5686 Posts |
I'd say PR-64 when it was encapsulated by PCGS 30 years ago. The ugly toning probably developed from some chemicals left on the surface.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
190135 Posts |
Looks like a proof... smells like a proof.... also agree on an older holder...  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18720 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4472 Posts |
I am going to take a wild guess at PF67 in an OGH. The mint most likely used some type of chemical that caused a lot of the 1941 proofs to develop ugly and strange toning.
|
| |
Replies: 50 / Views: 4,142 |
Posted 12/01/2021 9:24 pm
