Gene, a good while back, I asked the pointed question of the owner/author what is the rationale in including a 'unique' coin in the list? Oz correctly ilustrates the reply that was given (maybe not verbatim, but very close):
I cannot judge the merit of that response, as I am not omniscient. I do feel however, that for someone who supposedly knows vams inside and out, expressing the notion that a unique VAM that all vammers are painfully aware of, avidly searching for in every '21 that they see, (and is quite conspicuous from across the room), all seems like something that transcends incentive.
I feel that there may well be very basic, primeval urges working here.
Consider this: we are all human, and as such, derive certain basic characteristics through genetic heredity. Much of this is gender oriented, some of it is not.
Women know what guys like. Gals know how guys would like them to dress and look like, but the subliminal urge to instill jealousy in ones peers overrides the desire to be desired. If women dressed for the guys, they would be labeled with unkind names. Women dress for other women. Competition to be viewed as desirable by ones peers becomes more important than actually being desired by the guys. If a woman feels she is not competitive, inner pride will be sustained through the portrayal of her success in other directions; bagging a husband that is a good provider and father for instance.
Guys are not immune to this competitive onslaught of hormones. My car is faster, shinier, and cost more than yours. My truck is bigger, more powerful, and capable. I make X amount of $$$, I am the best at what I do. I have great prowess with the ladies. I did this or that, and got away with it. With guys it seems a bit more less complicated. It all boils down to mine is bigger than yours.
We all have the urge to protect our ego and compensate for our insecurities, it is inherent in each of us. We project the need to do this in many different ways, but some of our paths are more transparent than others. I view pride as a positive thing, but only within moderate degrees. Attempts to instill jealousy thorough our lust for pride is almost always counterproductive.
As Oz said, including a unique coin on any list is counterproductive, at best. I could make a list consisting of only unique coins, and call it the Top Five, but who would be interested in attempting such a thing? I could say something like 'it provides incentive for folks to find another of each of them'.
Seriously, in my opinion, it is irresponsible for a list maker to include coins that are unattainable. Coins that have a known population of less than 20 have no business being on any collector's list unless the list is intended for a very select breed of people. A measure of realism would go a long way toward stifling the cries of 'foul' from skeptics like me, and that is how I feel about it.
Quote:
The idea of including the 1921-D VAM 1X in the hit list 40 set was to see if others could locate another one of them.
The idea of including the 1921-D VAM 1X in the hit list 40 set was to see if others could locate another one of them.
I cannot judge the merit of that response, as I am not omniscient. I do feel however, that for someone who supposedly knows vams inside and out, expressing the notion that a unique VAM that all vammers are painfully aware of, avidly searching for in every '21 that they see, (and is quite conspicuous from across the room), all seems like something that transcends incentive.
I feel that there may well be very basic, primeval urges working here.
Consider this: we are all human, and as such, derive certain basic characteristics through genetic heredity. Much of this is gender oriented, some of it is not.
Women know what guys like. Gals know how guys would like them to dress and look like, but the subliminal urge to instill jealousy in ones peers overrides the desire to be desired. If women dressed for the guys, they would be labeled with unkind names. Women dress for other women. Competition to be viewed as desirable by ones peers becomes more important than actually being desired by the guys. If a woman feels she is not competitive, inner pride will be sustained through the portrayal of her success in other directions; bagging a husband that is a good provider and father for instance.
Guys are not immune to this competitive onslaught of hormones. My car is faster, shinier, and cost more than yours. My truck is bigger, more powerful, and capable. I make X amount of $$$, I am the best at what I do. I have great prowess with the ladies. I did this or that, and got away with it. With guys it seems a bit more less complicated. It all boils down to mine is bigger than yours.
We all have the urge to protect our ego and compensate for our insecurities, it is inherent in each of us. We project the need to do this in many different ways, but some of our paths are more transparent than others. I view pride as a positive thing, but only within moderate degrees. Attempts to instill jealousy thorough our lust for pride is almost always counterproductive.
As Oz said, including a unique coin on any list is counterproductive, at best. I could make a list consisting of only unique coins, and call it the Top Five, but who would be interested in attempting such a thing? I could say something like 'it provides incentive for folks to find another of each of them'.
Seriously, in my opinion, it is irresponsible for a list maker to include coins that are unattainable. Coins that have a known population of less than 20 have no business being on any collector's list unless the list is intended for a very select breed of people. A measure of realism would go a long way toward stifling the cries of 'foul' from skeptics like me, and that is how I feel about it.
Edited by zeewool
07/31/2010 10:56 am
07/31/2010 10:56 am























