| Author |
Replies: 297 / Views: 64,175 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
809 Posts |
In other words...its not silver? 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
592 Posts |
In other words...they will not decide one way or another.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3592 Posts |
Yes, I would be disappointed to say the least...you already had "questionable authenticity"...at the very least they should send it back and reimburse your money.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts |
It depends on whether they gave it a code 86(No Decision) or code 90(Not Genuine). 86 gets you a refund when they cannot definitively authenticate it or deem it counterfeit, that is usually the case for coins with extreme damage of some sort that makes marker matching impossible. 90 gets you no refund and the coin is shipped back in a body bag and I bet that this coin falls into the latter category. Altered genuine coins also fall under the 90 code(ex. a 1922-D Lincoln Cent with the D removed).
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1348 Posts |
Thats crazy! I woudl also want a reponse of either yay or nay
|
|
Valued Member
United States
91 Posts |
Yeah, that's a real downer, I hope they'll at least reimburse you for it.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
313 Posts |
bio I don't understand either it is or it is't if they can't say,  who can?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts |
86 No Decision- Coin's status inconclusive No Opinion Fee refunded. In the rare instances where the experts at PCGS are unable to determine conclusively that a coin is either genuine or counterfeit, that coin will be returned to the submitter ungraded.
PCGS spends a great deal of time examining coins that have been harshly cleaned, corroded and or tooled. PCGS must be able to positively determine that a coin is both genuine and has not been "holed and plugged". In some situations the surface of the coin is completely destroyed, and in these instances PCGS will not render an opinion on the coin. Many counterfeit coins are harshly altered or intentionally damaged in an attempt to fool the grading services. If a coin is worn or damaged to an extent that makes it impossible to identify the date, mint mark, or variety, a no-grade 86 will be issued.
90 Not Genuine- Fake coin or altered mintmark, date, variety Questionable Authenticity Fee not refunded. The coin is either a known counterfeit or exhibits characteristics of known counterfeits and is therefore highly suspect. This category includes otherwise genuine coins which have been altered to simulate rarities (re-engraved dates, added mintmarks, removed mintmarks, etc.)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1315 Posts |
Well I thought this mystery would be solved at this point. But onward it goes. Questionable Authenticity....you would think they would tell you what exactly was questionable about the authenticity? But no....so here we go. Do you think it was plated? Let us know. 
Edited by Doucet 03/04/2011 6:31 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
757 Posts |
it certainly didn't appear plated to me, given that it has a ring going around the reeding, much like a normal clad/silver.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1081 Posts |
That sucks that after all of that, it came back as "questionable authenticity." Make sure to post the code , at least if it's the 86, you get your money back. The good news is that for all those nay sayers, that does mean it's not an ordinary Kennedy half. Something is up with it, whether it be genuine silver, or intentionally modified to appear that way.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
809 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
9104 Posts |
Not saying this is a fake, but I've always felt that if someone can make a fake good enough to fool the experts, then for all practical purposes, it's genuine. The reason I don't think it's fake is a logical one: Why would anyone make a fake of a five figure coin that is so good that even the experts can't tell, then spend it for a half buck?
I'd be sending it to NGC and ANACS if need be.
I understand wanting only to do non-destructive testing, but I'm wondering if an 86 might justify other tests. For example, if a tiny nick is the only way to prove things one way or the other, nothing is lost if it's fake, and if it's genuine it won't matter, because any other genuine ones would have to have a similar nick.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
958 Posts |
bigfred people do things for various reasons some unexplainable
Some like to help , give and care thats how they achieve pleasure in life , while some like to lie ,steal,cheat decieve that how they get their pleasure
I dont know why but someone took a baseball bat to my mail box. The police cuaght him bashing mail boxes late at night another weekend and asked how many he damaged, he confessed to over 20 mail boxes smiled about it and only regreted getting cuaght
He took some secret joy in doing this dont know why and this was a guy over 40yrs old that acted alone while he did this. The creepiest part is the police said he would smash a mail box at 3-5 am the later come back and watch at 8-9 am from a parked car as the people pulled out of their driveway to work and found the smashed box in the road. This guy got off one watching people finding something he destroyed
Yet some people give all they have in life to help others I met a lady that lived alone and sheltered homeless cats she was missing teeth and never bought stuff for herself yet paid 100$ a week in food to feed over 50 cats living in her house.
If someone thought they could plate a half dollar silver and throw it into circulation and see if it ever popped up online , thats prob how they got their jolies luaghing and following this post all the way.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
99 Posts |
I agree with bigfred but, then there is always a negative to a positive. if they did make a fake you would think they would try and sell if before they dumped into circulation. Another scenario is they may have tried to sell it, and someone didn't want to take the chance and pick it up due to it may be a fake. They probably then decided to just put into circulation and like Copper top said and see if it popped up on the interwebs.
|
| |
Replies: 297 / Views: 64,175 |