| Author |
 Replies: 29 / Views: 1,468 |
|
Valued Member
United States
229 Posts |
Edited by Oldgrouchyguy
12/05/2022 6:55 pm
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
227 Posts |
There was a documented struck counterfeit for S-161; I have included the image and the atts I identified in my article on these. I post these here but admittedly need to spend a little more time reviewing yours with them. Any chance of getting an edge view of the one posted?   |
|
Valued Member
United States
229 Posts |
Edited by Oldgrouchyguy
12/05/2022 8:02 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
227 Posts |
Edited by burfle23
12/05/2022 9:18 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
229 Posts |
Same dies, maybe more tooling at the chin? Maybe the Heritage coin is a copy of your copy? |
|
Valued Member
United States
229 Posts |
The R in Liberty was recut on the Heritage example. Great, now we have die states of Counterfeit coins. The main reason that I don't think it was die struck is the crack in the field under the ribbon. It just doesn't happen like that. Edited by Oldgrouchyguy
12/05/2022 8:15 pm
|
|
Moderator
United States
26063 Posts |
Quote:
now we have die states of Counterfeit coins. .  I'm otherwise just lurking on this thread to learn something. Sorry that I don't have any insight.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push."
-----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed."
-----King Adz
|
|
Valued Member
United States
227 Posts |
I have written articles on two deceptive counterfeits with 2 die states each...
|
|
Valued Member
United States
229 Posts |
I posted that coin to a site where many EACers check in, some in the biz for decades. Where did you publish?
Edited by Oldgrouchyguy
12/05/2022 10:29 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2609 Posts |
Seems like the chin was just polished off at the defect in the other example. I'll leave the rest to your capable hands.  |
|
Valued Member
United States
229 Posts |
Leaf under T United had its tip repaired as well; the hairline above the forehead has been recut so now it looks like Liberty's wearing a wig, etc. My question is, I guess, how can this (these) fool people long invested in the biz, nevermind the grading company?
Edited by Oldgrouchyguy
12/06/2022 12:11 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9437 Posts |
---
Edited by numismatic student
12/06/2022 12:51 am
|
|
Valued Member
United States
229 Posts |
NumismaticStudent: wouldn't you know, my Colonial-collecting friend was asking if Jack Young had seen it; that he must know about it...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9437 Posts |
He has now.  I deleted my post because I felt that I overstepped. That's something that he should have revealed although he is probably too humble to come out and say what I said. |
|
Valued Member
United States
229 Posts |
It was becoming apparent... there should be a section for "What's My Line?" type of posts
|
|
Valued Member
United States
227 Posts |
While there are some striking similarities between the OP posted example and the documented counterfeit there are some major differences including the major counterfeit attribution points. The documented fake was struck from dies made from a known genuine example and the edge helps confirm it struck:  As far as my articles, the majority are published on Coin Week with several also in EAC's Penny-Wise. I posted my summary on the S-161 on the EAC website. The op example has some areas that look "casty"- would love to see the edge and weigh it, etc. I need to make more time studying this one; thanks for posting and the HA link! |
|
Replies: 29 / Views: 1,468 |
|
Posted 12/05/2022 7:50 pm
