| Author |
Replies: 19 / Views: 2,833 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1267 Posts |
WOW, now that's a pretty coin :)
Thanks for posting a picture Ben
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2254 Posts |
Fantastic specimen. I will gladly trade you 15 upside down edge letter Presidential dollars for that one. I've heard they're pretty rare!! They are straight from a brand new roll and are all at least AU50.  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2269 Posts |
 Beautiful coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2600 Posts |
|
|
Forum Mom
 United States
5877 Posts |
Very nice coin! Even by EAC standards, I think it'd make EF45. 
|
|
Moderator
  United States
23522 Posts |
I am awaiting permission from the dealer from whom I acquired this to publicize his name here. Or not.  He's got a lot of really nice stuff listed.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
3730 Posts |
Beautiful coin.
Thanks for the picture.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
50 Posts |
I'll guess that it's an N-4 Silly head. 
|
|
Moderator
  United States
23522 Posts |
quote: I'll guess that it's an N-4 Silly head.
You would certainly be in a position to know, I guess.  Ladies and gentlemen, it pains me to reveal a good source, but the poster above is the gentleman from whom I acquired this coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1767 Posts |
{quote]I'll guess that it's an N-4..[/quote] That's a new one, at least for me. What does the 'N' mean?
BTW Very nice coin you have there, Dave.
Edited by Mila_cent 03/13/2007 5:04 pm
|
|
Moderator
  United States
23522 Posts |
Mila_Cent, that refers the the Newcomb variety, after H.R. Newcomb, who first described the varying die states and varieties of Large Cents. Newcomb numbers are to Large Cents what VAM's are to Morgans.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
50 Posts |
((( That's a new one, at least for me. What does the 'N' mean? ))) As Dave points out, "N-4" is a shorthand way of stating that the die marriage for this particular coin is "Newcomb Four". "Die marriage" refers to the combination of a specific obverse die with a specific reverse die, and each such unique combination of dies is assigned a "Newcomb" attribution. Suppose that in 1837, two obverse dies, "O1" and "O2" were used, along with two reverse dies, "R1" and "R2" (typically for early coins, ten or so obverse and reverse dies might be used per year). Mathematically, this would allow for four possible die marriages, O1+R1, O1+R2, O2+R1, and O2+R2. Now, in reality, it's quite possible that some die marriages never occurred. For example, suppose O1 broke shortly after being put into use R1, and never had an opportunity to be paired with R2. In that case, the date would only have three die-marriages (O1+R1, O2+R1, O2+R2). In this case, we would have attributed Newcomb varieties, N1 = O1+R1, N2 = O2+R1 and N3 = O2+R2. Kinda looks like chemistry, doesn't it? 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1767 Posts |
Thank you Dave and James. Something new I learn today! Yep. chemistry 
Edited by Mila_cent 03/16/2007 8:43 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
quote: Mila_Cent, that refers the the Newcomb variety, after H.R. Newcomb, who first described the varying die states and varieties of Large Cents. Newcomb numbers are to Large Cents what VAM's are to Morgans.
Actually Newcomb wasn't the first. His work built on the work of his mentor Andrews (first name escapes me at the moment) Andrews published his work on the die varieties of large cents from 1816 to 1857 in 1882 with a second edition published in 1883. Newcomb expanded the late date varieties considerably but most of the Necomb book on the middle dates is simply the Andrews book with the A numbers changed to N numbers. The few additions are tacked onto the end of each year. Even though Newcomb book has been superceded it still has a strong influence on the collecting community. When the update to the middle dates was planned it was intended to update the emission sequence and to renumber the series based on how they were issued. With the late dates a great many of the Newcomb varieties have been delisted and renumbering here would have also made sense. But in the end the old Newcomb numbers have prevaled and for one of the first times the varieties numbers for a series do NOT reflect the name of the author of the standard reference for the series.
|
|
Moderator
  United States
23522 Posts |
I stand corrected. Talk about learning something new learned today.... 
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 19 / Views: 2,833 |
Page 2 of 2
|