1875 Seated Liberty Half Dollar Striking Error

I doubt it there would not be any incuse lines left on a planchet after striking, the metal would under go a big transformation as it heated up from the pressure and was struck.The coining machines produce between 180 to 250 tons of pressure, not much would survive under pressure like that. Inspections of the planchets also would be done, and unless one of the rollers that flattens and lengthens the strips of silver from bars would have damage, this would be seen and changed out pretty quickly, as it would show up as a repeating pattern on each long strip of metal before the individual planchets were cut out, and they are also inspected before they go on to the next step in the process the upsetting machine which creates the upraised rim edge. I see no way that anything beyond extra metal in the planchets would cause anything like this, and if it were a foreign object or improper alloy mix there would be a different color and remnants of the other metal embedded into the coin.

What led me to that idea was adjustment marks on early coins ...

But ... There's something afoot in 1875 and 1876 with the Seated half dollars. LOTS of these coins have foreign undertypes. There are even coins slabbed by PCGS and NGC as MS and Proof which exhibit the undertypes. And ... there's more than one coin design. From what I have seen, there are at least 2 different types. I have now seen dozens of 1875-76 Half dollars with this unusual trait.

Even worn coins will show some traces. Much like the date on a Buffalo nickel goes pretty deep into the coin... so it seems to be with the silver coins as well. Seems the deeper recesses would be harder than the legends or devices from work hardening.

I'll post links to some of these, as time allows, in case anybody wants to look at them. I even found one where it's obvious that the Lion is wearing a crown. I'm pretty sure there's never been any heraldry like that on American coins.

Chance

That's all fine and dandy, Dave.... and with all due respect, I am aware that they were only making those 2 denominations for Venezuela at the time.

That doesn't change the fact that the undertype on these coins is neither of those coins. Nor does it change the fact that it "is" there.

It's something of a mystery. Something that begs investigation.

You guys all just want to do the same thing ... if it isn't in the book, dismiss it out of hand as though everything there is to be learned ... has already been learned. When you close your mind ... I guess your education is complete.

Spend a little time looking at some of these ... you'll see what I'm talking about.

I'm still skeptical about those being scratches. Some appear to be incuse while others appear raised, and some have tips that resemble flagstaffs and arrow heads...or spear tips.

I'm going to send this coin, and the other one I bought ... to Bill Bugert. I'll bet he can look past the obvious. Nobody here seems to be able to get past the "scratches". There's LOTS more going on with this coin, and it's the only one that I have seen that has those particular marks. It's unfortunate, becauae nobody can see or address anything else.

How do the eagle's talons come to appear as they do on this coin? That is absolutely NOT normal. Something has happened that has altered that feature on this reverse die. I've seen it on other 1875s as well, but not all of them.

Maybe somebody that had access to the machinery had a bunch of stolen foreign silver and whacked into a more recognizable and liquid form ... you won't find that in the treasurer's report.

Chance

with SsuperDdave, I'm defintely not against dismissing something strange, or unexpected, (that's what I love about die varieties - like VAM's, where many new discovery pieces have been found through due dilligence and lots of searching), but the two examples I've seen you post on (this one and the IHC) are obviously PMD.

Even with the interest in vamming, it takes two coins with the exact same pick up points, to confirm something new, and a lot of new discoveries have been made recently, I'm not sure of the numbers - but I'd venture a guess that is a couple of hundred new die pairings found in the past decade. Yes new and exciting discoveries await out there yet to be found, researched and proven.

Not to be a downer but when ever there is moved metal on a coin it is plain and simple PMD - ALWAYS - every time - no exceptions to that - ever.

That's because they're scratches. Only you think otherwise.




I definitely see a pattern of some sort on the coin. Can you feel the edges when you scrape a fingernail across them?

I see a stain that loosely resembles a Rorschach Test

Epic, because its true.

But seriouly. I see nothing on any of these coins that would indicate undertype of any type. Perhaps a side by side with the coins your thinkin were used might help. But I dont think theres anything more to these coins than what they are advertised as.

Is this guy serious? I mean, come on. He can't be serious.