| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 3,980 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4085 Posts |
Hard to tell unless you get it in hand. I think there is a least a chance that the red you are seeing is original luster, but it is also possible that it is a cleaned and re-toned coin. The fact that the details are uneven - for example the base of the left wheat stalk has significant detail while the right does not - makes me think it has a chance. For $4, I would have taken that gamble.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
Looks like a little of both cleaned and weak strike. I don't think the red that you see is remnants of original mint luster.  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Something unnatural-looking about it to me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2215 Posts |
Looks cleaned to me, with remnants of a thumbprint on Abe's face.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19969 Posts |
G-VG details, definitely cleaned.
There are no weakly struck coins from 1915, at least I've never seen one. The details on the master hub were sharpened in 1915 and so the Mint produced fresh dies for all the branch mints. IMO, this coin is worth <$1.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6478 Posts |
I disagree with week strike. The rims are very noticeable, only worn down by circulation.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5828 Posts |
Looking at it now, its defiantly cleaned.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3098 Posts |
The 1915-D arrived. The color is a bit darker than in the seller's photos. I would say it's cleaned, but it is an interesting coin. While Lincoln's hair and ear are very worn, the obverse lettering is sharp. The wheat stalks have a lot of detail remaining, hardly what you would expect from a worn coin. Was it possibly struck through something to account for the difference in detail between the obverse and reverse? Here are some photos I took of the coin   Paul Bulgerin
Edited by Paul Bulgerin
07/04/2015 3:52 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Possibly, but I would agree it's been cleaned.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19969 Posts |
Quote:
Was it possibly struck through something to account for the difference in detail between the obverse and reverse? Nope, it's worn just on the high points on both sides. It looks like an EDS because it is, the master hub was sharpened in 1915 most coins have nice details. Lincoln Cent Lover!VERDI-CARE™ INVENTOR https://verdi.care/
Edited by BadThad
07/05/2015 1:42 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
134 Posts |
What is an EDS? Sorry for the dumb question, checked the glossary before asking, ED-environmental damage, but EDS was not there. I'm new to coin collecting and trying to learn. Thanks!!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
946 Posts |
|
|
New Member
45 Posts |
Nice!  |
|
New Member
United States
8 Posts |
There goes $4. Picked up one of these the other day in better shape for 6 cents.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4233 Posts |
My first thought seeing all those little bubbles on the reverse around ONE CENT was that it was (badly) plated with something to make it look red BU. Is that second reverse photo actual color? Because when I zoom in, it looks like algae is growing on it.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 3,980 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 06/22/2015 4:16 pm
