| Author |
Replies: 24 / Views: 4,128 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1747 Posts |
I think before we call this 100% PMD we need the weight of the coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5324 Posts |
A pic with a regular old toonie side by side will answer most of the questions.
|
|
New Member
 Canada
8 Posts |
Hey, The weight on both coins seem to be the same. 0.25oz or 7 grams (not sure if any of these would be the proper unit of measurement). 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5324 Posts |
7.3 GRAMS is the correct weight for pre 2012 toonies, my guess it's grounded down, unless you weighed the 1996 and the odd toonie on the same scale and both read 7 grams
Edited by john100 11/02/2016 4:06 pm
|
|
New Member
 Canada
8 Posts |
Yes, I weighed them both separately on the same scale.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5324 Posts |
So the scale is off, looks like a largest strike through grease maybe if so worth something.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2428 Posts |
That coin had a date with a Grinder or sanding machine. PMD
|
|
New Member
 Canada
8 Posts |
Sorry, I used my kitchen scale.. Lol
Anything else I can do?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5324 Posts |
Take this coin to a jeweler and asked them to weigh it, you will have an accurate weight
|
|
New Member
 Canada
8 Posts |
I'm seeing how a lot of you are stating it's PMD. That said, is it worth going through the hoops of seeing if this is going to be worth something or not? Thanks for all the help.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5324 Posts |
If the off beat coin weighs below 7.3 grams on an accurate scale it's for sure PMD, or place the two toonies on top of each other and turn it on it's edge and photo it to see if it is slimmer but the weight will be the way to go. If the coin is a huge strike thru, it is rare on a toonie maybe a couple hundred bucks or more
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2187 Posts |
Quote: not some kind of a doubling effect or anything, I believe what you see is the commemorative 2002 obverse reading 1952-2002. oh... whoops  you're completely right
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
693 Posts |
The fine lines across the error side are worrisome. That's not something you'd see on an error, unless it was harshly cleaned. With a strike-through error, the diameter would be the same as a normal coin. With a broadstrike error the diameter would be larger, but there'd be no reeding. It looks a lot more like PMD than any sort of authentic error type.
|
|
New Member
 Canada
8 Posts |
Thanks for everyone's help.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
514 Posts |
I would be inclined to agree with "post mint damage"
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 24 / Views: 4,128 |
Page 2 of 2
|