| Author |
Replies: 55 / Views: 13,179 |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
5591 Posts |
Rob: Do you think that the '82 DDO that you showed and referenced to JIm (the one with the doubled denticles)could have been the same die as the 1876 type 2 (with the R/P'd T) that has the same doubled denticles in the same spot. They reused 1876 Obv 1 dies in both '81 & 82. I always thought it strange that the 2/1 '82 had the same doubled denticles as the 1876 Ty 2 scarcity.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1353 Posts |
Bill, I don't think so. The 76 has obv 1 single serifs and the 82 has 2/1 doubled ones.
http://www.victoriancent.com2011 & 2025 Fred Bowman Award Winner, 2020 J. Douglas Ferguson Award Winner, & 2022 Paul Fiocca Award Winner. Life Member of RCNA.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
5591 Posts |
Yes, but ALL the old 1876 Obv dies were repunched in '81 & '82 to make the single serifs double. And the Type 2 1876 "R/P'd T" has the same doubled denticles and R/P's letters as the 1882 2/1 (A's & N) or nearly so.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1353 Posts |
Not positive which 76 you are referring to. Here is one type of RP "T": https://www.PCGS.com/cert/35428858A second was the one we put on page 301 of the 2011 Charlton. Neither of those two types have doubled denticles. There is a third, but I don't have a picture of it. I don't remember if it had doubled denticles, or not. Having said all that, I think if Heaton used any leftover dies from 1876 in 1881 or 1882, and I am not sure that they did, they had single serifs. I think any 1881 and 1882 dies for circulating cents that had doubled serifs were sunk in 1881 and 1882.
http://www.victoriancent.com2011 & 2025 Fred Bowman Award Winner, 2020 J. Douglas Ferguson Award Winner, & 2022 Paul Fiocca Award Winner. Life Member of RCNA.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
New Zealand
1679 Posts |
Just thought this may help? A Quote from 2015 Quote: I'm aware that there were two different dies that produced obverse 2 over obv.1 coins with this example or type being the more common. However I rarely come across these attributed. I believe this is because a lot of people are not aware of the markers for this coin. I know most of you on this site are well informed and will already be aware of the markers but for someone just starting out it may be of assistance. If it only helps one person then I'd be happy.
Cheers, Bill Their photo  1881 Die 1 note the apostrophe between N'A   1882 Die 1 note the apostrophe between N'A  
Cheers Don
Vickies cents and GB Farthings nut. "Old" is a figure of speech and nothing more
Edited by fourmack 06/16/2019 7:07 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
5591 Posts |
Rob: Sorry guys .. I was going with a 73 year old memory without looking at the coins. I confused (from memory) the 3 types of the 2/1's with the 3 types of '76 full (RP'd) T's. The type 2 1882 2/1 (as Dan and I called them) was not in the book and it had the doubled denticles and RP'ing in Canada, but nothing like the type 3 with the heavy punch doubling. I really haven't looked at my coins in nearly 2 years and the memory has blips. Since I have to quit golf awaiting the spinal surgery, I'll have to get back to looking at what I have again and catch up my inventory list with notes. Sorry I led you guys on a goose chase, but it finally made me look at some coins again. I have 3 each of the 2 types of 2/1's (Ty 2&3)with RP'ing and 7 of the type 1 that has no doubling
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
1923 Posts |
I finally sent PCGS my second 1882 slightly doubled letters and doubled denticles for a grade its a little different than the first one I sent in for grading. I'll post both coins for your viewing and thoughts on them. The one graded AU-58 has noticeable doubling in Regina as well as Canada with double denticles Canada-Victoria. The AU-50 has doubling in Canada and double denticles Canada-Victoria.  AU-50  AU-58
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1101 Posts |
Very nice coins papeldog!
I think this die is just about as hard to find as the one with heavier doubling.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
5591 Posts |
To me, these 2 coins are from different dies, with very slightly different repunching and definite differences in the denticle doubling between Canada and Vicky as to offset. Maybe the amount of shifting during the MD caused these two coins to look a little different .. or maybe they are 2 different dies. We discussed these alot a few years ago and kinda tossed our hands up. Remember that this 2/1 die started out as an 1876 Obv and the dies had multiple whacks with a hammer and punch. When you have multiple handpunching of letters combined with who knows how much movement of the die on some of the actual strike due to Machine Doubling, it's going to be impossible to track down firmly. The 82's are a story unto themselves concerning the number of actual dies used throughout the mintage year.. 1's, 1a's, 1a/1's, 2/1's, 2/1a's and 2's, with and without repaired T's and N's. I won't even mention any hub-doubling.
Edited by okiecoiner 12/21/2021 11:58 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
1923 Posts |
If they get back to coin shows in the future Okie I'll try and make one back East. I'll bring both coins if you have your show and tell lounge party for you and others that might be there to look at and study. The AU-55 was one from you.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
5591 Posts |
Well, that's strange because I seldom pick up or collect anything that's close to bright and shiny, if you get my drift.
I never thought about how old this thread is and how technical that we got in hammering things out. Jim, you've opened up a can of worms again.
Edited by okiecoiner 12/21/2021 3:11 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
1923 Posts |
I just find variety collecting fascinating especially in the years 1859, 1881, 1882 of Canadian large cents so many varieties, a person could spend their whole life studying them and maybe never find everything.
Phil310: I think they are easier to identify in the higher grades I've been lucky
Edited by papeldog 12/21/2021 3:26 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
5591 Posts |
Yes, I think that you, Rob, Dan, Gene, Randy, Tim and Houndog all feel the same about the early Vicky cents. It's what has kept us all reasonably young
|
|
Moderator
 Canada
10460 Posts |
Quote: ...a person could spend their whole life studying them and maybe never find everything. A person can spend their whole lifetime searching for an 1881 Single Serif N and not find one... As far as I know, Bill and myself are the only persons who have found two examples each.
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert OppenheimerContent of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_USMy eBay store
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
1923 Posts |
Yes SPP you + Bill are lucky to have found 2 of the 1881 SSN's I consider myself very lucky to have found 1. I think its one of the hardest Canadian large cent varieties to find in any condition.
I'd also credit you with 2 + 1/3 1881 SSN's.
Edited by papeldog 12/21/2021 4:07 pm
|
|
|
Replies: 55 / Views: 13,179 |
|