| Author |
Replies: 19 / Views: 5,719 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
580 Posts |
Anyone who offers an opinion on the basis of just those two photographs is doing themselves and the forum a disservice.
Better photographs, properly oriented, would be a tremendous help. If this is just as simple as a dime glued to a cent, then a picture with the dime reverse facing up and taken directly from above should show this clearly since the dime is smaller than the penny.
|
|
New Member
 United States
4 Posts |
I can't find any seams where it would be glued together the reading from the dime side runs over to the vent side in places 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5240 Posts |
HGK3, actually it is not a disservice. If you look closely to the photo you will see reeding on the dime and can see no such thing on the cent other than where it was ground smooth to the size of a dime. If you could see the reeding on the cent there might be an argument that there may have been a rush to judgement. Again, this is not a mint error coin, it was made to look this way by someone.
|
|
New Member
 United States
4 Posts |
|
|
New Member
 United States
4 Posts |
Apologies, getting used to this format..
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5240 Posts |
It takes a little practice. You'll find a way to orient your pics correctly. I wish there were better news about your cent but it's been altered to look like a mint error cent.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
75387 Posts |
No errors here, just an altered coin. PSD.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Forum Dad
 United States
24193 Posts |
Quote: Anyone who offers an opinion on the basis of just those two photographs is doing themselves and the forum a disservice. Ridiculous, this coin is obviously post mint manufactured. Quote: I can't find any seams where it would be glued together the reading from the dime side runs over to the vent side in places I see the seam plain as day in the second picture. Quote: If this is just as simple as a dime glued to a cent, then a picture with the dime reverse facing up and taken directly from above should show this clearly since the dime is smaller than the penny. The penny was ground down some, but it's pretty obvious in the OP's second picture the penny side is sticking out.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
75387 Posts |
 with Bobby. Obviously happened after it left the U.S. Mint.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5240 Posts |
I tried to explain that......
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34453 Posts |
@PC, first welcome to CCF. Second, that is an interesting piece that you have there. As correctly noted by @coop it is a so-called Magician's coin. We see them posted here on CCF several times a year. What I find interesting is that it appears as though the method of manufacture has changed over time. More specifically, it is my observation that your type, where both coins had one side ground down and then the two halves were bonded together seems to be the "old" method of manufacture. Typically for combinations that include a cent, we see them with wheat cents. The "new" method of manufacture is to hollow out one coin leaving an intact rim and then fitting into the remnant chamber a slightly undersized second coin. Brand new Magician's coins that you buy on ebay are generally made this way. Of course, I haven't studied this seeming progression in manufacturing method, so maybe it is nothing. In any case, I'm glad to see that you have found one of these.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
More images of Magicians coins, (newer ones)  Note the seam on the white arrows on coin below:  Machine shop special:    Placing a dime in the reverse makes it looks like the cent turned into a dime from a distance, when all that was done is to turn over the coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
580 Posts |
I never meant to imply that the coin was a genuine error, that it was a fake, or that anyone was correct or incorrect in their opinions. My point was to point out that the OP submitted two, frankly poor, photos of an unusual coin and that opinions concerning the nature of the coin based on those photos alone were suspect because the photos didn't show nearly enough to support those conclusions. Alteration of the coin after leaving the mint is the most likely answer and a Magician's coin certainly seems to make the most sense, but I still think better photos of the item to be sure is warranted. Had the OP taken the advice of the first few posters he might have disposed of the coin prematurely, and that's something we should be trying to avoid happening.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
751 Posts |
Just no way for that type error to occur. Unless it was done deliberately.
Dan
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 19 / Views: 5,719 |
Page 2 of 2
|