Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsSpecializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes.








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Denver Unc Mint Set With No Mint Mark D Nickel All Other Coin's Have The D

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
First Page  Showing last 15 replies.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 17 / Views: 2,821Next Topic Page 2 of 2
Pillar of the Community
United States
7630 Posts
 Posted 06/28/2019  12:38 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add westernsky to your friends list
1. A no "D" coin in a "D" set would be considered a packaging error. It happens.

2. I have no idea what you are calling an "error" in regards to the main door on Monticello.

3. Can mint sets be tampered with? Sure.
New Member
United States
30 Posts
 Posted 06/28/2019  12:56 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Raizac to your friends list
thanks, you two and I am not sure that's why I am asking the forum. and for the monticello's door here I marked it for you
Denver-Unc-Mint-Set-With-No-Mint-Mark-D-Nickel-All-Other-Coin's-Have-The-D
Edited by Raizac
06/28/2019 01:03 am
New Member
United States
30 Posts
 Posted 06/28/2019  01:02 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Raizac to your friends list
that is not damaged it's a raised.. on all of them. so 1971 no S is just packaging error as well? wait what about the penny one with no S mint mark packaging error too?
Pillar of the Community
United States
701 Posts
 Posted 06/28/2019  01:07 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Believe7 to your friends list
If your coin is at the MS67 Full Step level, you're on to something.
Pillar of the Community
United States
7630 Posts
 Posted 06/28/2019  01:18 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add westernsky to your friends list
The 71 No "S" Proof was not a packaging error. The mint mark was not added to the die as it should have been. There were several other instances of this happening with proof sets in 1970 with the dime, in 1971 with the nickel and in 1990 with the cent. (There may be others, too).

Your "D" mint set with a no mint mark nickel is A Philadelphia minted coin that was asssembled in to the wrong set. It is a packinging error.

Your coins look normal to me. I do not think what you are seeing with the door is an error of any kind.
New Member
United States
30 Posts
 Posted 06/28/2019  01:47 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Raizac to your friends list
well, thank you @westernsky that's really good information. now for the comeback.. how did a Philadelphia coin get to the Denver mint to be packaged in a Denver unc mint set and it's a 47-year-old packing error!! but really thanks for answering my ?'s so $3.90x 5 sets + 5 for shipping 29.00 total
Pillar of the Community
United States
7630 Posts
 Posted 06/28/2019  02:25 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add westernsky to your friends list
I believe the sets were most likely packaged at a contracted facility by contract employees. The bulk coins from each mint facility were shipped to a central facility where the packaging took place. When you've got coins coming and going and employees that probably are pretty much clueless things happen. The coins look the same to them.

That's how packaging errors happen.

Not adding an "S" mintmark on Proof dies is a whole other story. It happened multiple times over a 20 year period. The mint finally got tired of it and solved the problem by adding the mintmark to the master die instead of adding the mintmark by hand to each individual die.
Pillar of the Community
United States
2775 Posts
 Posted 06/28/2019  2:34 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Halo1st to your friends list
Is a grease filled device also possible? Thanks, Doug.
Pillar of the Community
United States
7630 Posts
 Posted 06/29/2019  12:21 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add westernsky to your friends list
Possible, but unlikely.
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 06/29/2019  01:43 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list
I was thinking a grease filled issue also.
Valued Member
United States
399 Posts
 Posted 11/18/2024  6:08 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Dough101 to your friends list
Denver Mint makes their own coins and do their own packaging. Denver Mint don''t make Philadelphia coins and don't do Philadelphia coin packaging etc. This is a mint error not a packaging error. The only difference is. it happens in uncirculated mint set; not in proof set. This is a rare find. Don't remove it from the plastic. That is your only proof.
Pillar of the Community
United States
7630 Posts
 Posted 11/18/2024  6:36 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add westernsky to your friends list
This thread is FIVE years old.

This set is STILL a packaging and an assembly mistake!



Pillar of the Community
United States
1791 Posts
 Posted 11/18/2024  8:04 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Seeker_101 to your friends list
I don't know if its uncommon or not but I was just looking at a Denver set that had a Philly nickel in it. All other coins were Ds.
Moderator
Learn More...
United States
97546 Posts
 Posted 11/18/2024  8:07 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Dearborn to your friends list
After reading the entire topic from the start - and then saw Coop's name, then I knew I was reading old news.
Valued Member
United States
399 Posts
 Posted 11/19/2024  12:11 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Dough101 to your friends list
The mint error can only occur in the "Proof set." This is brainwashing, opinion, not fact. I would be jealous, too, if I didn't have that coin.
Page 2 of 2   Previous TopicReplies: 17 / Views: 2,821Next Topic Page 2 of 2
First Page  Showing last 15 replies.
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.


    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.34 seconds to rattle this change. Forums