| Author |
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,747 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
857 Posts |
Looks to have a nice cameo effect, but I wouldn't say PL. MS-64.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3649 Posts |
MS-64. Nice eye appeal, although not enough for PL.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1370 Posts |
Not indicative of the pictures fields are reflective to about 8 inches
|
|
Valued Member
United States
100 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3540 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
The obvious ding on Liberty's jaw doesn't help. No wear, but the patina has been rubbed on some of the high points. A few hairline scratches sufficiently deep enough to be seen on the reverse, under the patina. Some light scuffs, both sides. Slight loss of hair detail over Liberty's ear - must be a light strike in this area; I can't see any wear, and luster seems to be undisturbed at this point. Strong luster obvious, showing from under the patina: I have not seen this very often. An attractive coin, TPG may be tempted to grade higher to have a happy customer, (and thus repeat business), but MS-63, (nearer to 64 than 62).
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18670 Posts |
MS64+
the 84CC is known for bold strikes. this coin falls into that category. minor surface anomalies. something going on around the ear area with discoloration. luster appears to be unbroken across the cheek. both of these assessments I believe keep it from a full 65
|
|
Valued Member
United States
303 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7621 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1298 Posts |
64 here also. Photos are too grainy for me to designate a PL.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36746 Posts |
Much nicer than the 64's I'm use to seeing. MS-65 for me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1370 Posts |
Guess its time for the reveal, and I agree it is next to impossible to determine PL from these pictures. I do believe this one does look closer to a 65 than 64 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36746 Posts |
Photos didn't make me think it was PL. I do believe it is better than 64 though.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
64 still seems to be a bit too high, to my eye.
In defense of TPGraders: It must be remembered that they have a few distinct advantages, when examining a coin for grading. 1. They get to examine the coin naked, hand held. 2. They don't have to worry about sometime less than perfect on screen pictures. 3. They can move to coin to see it under various angles if incident light. 4. They have the advantage of the use of a good quality 10X loupe. 5. They don't have to see it under the screen of the plastic of the slab. 6. They may be tempted to grade higher, to have a happy customer, with the greater probability of repeat business.
Nevertheless I really enjoy the challenge of grading other members' coins, so that I can enhance my own grading skills. So keep 'em coming.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
100 Posts |
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,747 |
Page 2 of 2
|