Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer 300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsSpecializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

PCGS Labeled Counterfeit 1741 Rouble Sells For $1,100. Why?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
First Page  Showing last 15 replies.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 22 / Views: 4,259Next Topic Page 2 of 2
Valued Member
Learn More...
United States
466 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2019  2:07 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Sharkman to your friends list
Bobby
I agree with you that 32 bids when there are 16 bidders is unremarkable. I do the incremental up bidding myself. I am just astounded 16 people bid on this coin, unless it has meaningful value as a contemporary counterfeit.
Forum Dad
Learn More...
United States
24182 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2019  2:31 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add bobby131313 to your friends list
I've seen contemporary counterfeits go for thousands many times.


Quote:
I see a basis for implication of scienter. Describing the coin as genuine while omitting to disclose it as counterfeit is both a mistatement and an omission of material fact. Knowledge would be inputed to the seller from possession of the holder disclosing true facts. Intent would be inputed from carefully omitting known material facts from the description. It is well-established that misrepresentation of the content or meaning of a document, the written facts reflecting the TPG's expert opinion, can support an action for fraud.


You're grossly overthinking it. Anyone that looks at that listing and doesn't know it's counterfeit is an absolute idiot, moron, or *insert favorite dumb person synonym here*. There is no way any person with a tenth of a brain could look at that listing and think it's real. No fraud here, move along....
Valued Member
Learn More...
United States
466 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2019  3:01 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Sharkman to your friends list
We'll agree to disagree on our legal opinions and move on.
Pillar of the Community
United States
1962 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2019  3:16 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add realeswatcher to your friends list
No contemporary counterfeits were struck this well during that time frame, so forget that line of thinking.

"Counterfeit" in this case means MODERN (numismatic fake). I'd guess that some optimistic, lotto-loving soul is hoping beyond hope that PCGS was wrong.
Valued Member
Learn More...
United States
466 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2019  3:42 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Sharkman to your friends list
So whoever bought it didn't get what they expected. If they thought it real (listing says it retails for $5,000) it isn't. If they thought it a contemporary counterfeit worth thousands, it isn't. Sure hope they realize and return.
I have bought some of my favorite coins from honorable and reputable ebay sellers. I have also seen things that make me sick. I really have the feeling the seller is looking for a sucker. My dealer has told me it happens.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
United States
7963 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2019  5:33 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add tdziemia to your friends list

Quote:
I agree with you that 32 bids when there are 16 bidders is unremarkable. I do the incremental up bidding myself. I am just astounded 16 people bid on this coin, unless it has meaningful value as a contemporary counterfeit.


I was curious and took a look, and indeed, there was nothing remarkable about the early bidding (see play-by-play below). The first 13 bidders and 20 bids were done before it hit $175 (probably the ones who would pay that much for what they knew to be a counterfeit). Then there was a single $500 bid, and it looks like it took the next bidder 9 tries to figure out he had to go that high ... and was sniped at the end by the 16th bidder.
What WAS remarkable was that buyers would take a chance on a "5,000 Retail" coin sold by a seller of religious books who has only one other coin sale in his feedback: a recent sale of another Russian counterfeit.
(It looks like someone has decided that selling counterfeit coins is more lucrative than selling bibles).

Play-by-play
- First bidder put in a bid of $69 which registered at starting bid of $0.99.
- Bidder2 (novice with only 34 fb) tries to top this with 6 sequential bids, finally dropping out at $39.
- Bidders 3-9 each place a single bid till the last one tops the first bidders original bid at $77. In the meantime, the first bidder has put in two more new bids ($99 and $129).
- Bidder 10 tops the original bidder at $133, who does not return. Bidder 10 is in turn exceeded by bidders 11 and 12, each entering a single bid to get us up to 12 bidders and 19 bids, at $141 (less than 15% of the final bid).

Now it gets interesting, probably reflecting bidders who missed the fact this coin is a counterfeit.
- Bidder 13 places a bid of $501, but retracts it the next day.
- By the time of the retraction, Bidder 14 enters with a $500 bid.
- Bidder 15 tries 8 times to beat bidder 14, finally surpassing on the 9th try, at $550.
.. only to be outdone 8 hours later by Bidder 16, who places a bid that we can only guess, because even when bidder 15 DOUBLES his previous bid to $1,111, Bidder 16s bid is still high enough to win.


Edited by tdziemia
11/27/2019 7:16 pm
Pillar of the Community
United States
1757 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2019  5:45 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add colonialjohn to your friends list
Not being an expert on Russian Rouble counterfeits I do however observe the following:

1. Its interesting the weight of this piece is a dead match to the listed KM listed weight for a 80% Ag regal at also 25.85 grams.

2. The fabric and edge markings of this coin appear nothing as being a modern Chinese fabrication.

3. I doubt its made of anything but silver as platinum is too early for these Rouble (Ruble) issues as they were started to be minted in 1828. Being of a a debased silver alloy or a combination of base metals and weighing in at exactly the KM listed regal weight is almost an impossibility unless the seller just copied the weight from KM and this piece is of another weight?

Could be a $6000+ gamble by the buyer and/or a mistake by PCGS?

After a 60s look I see no red flags on this piece "not being an 18thC piece? A very unusual E-BAY entry.

John Lorenzo
United States
Non-Russian Coin Collector
Edited by colonialjohn
11/27/2019 5:57 pm
Pillar of the Community
Russian Federation
5178 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2019  6:39 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add january1may to your friends list
Contemporary counterfeit.
1741 ruble.
Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha ha ha hahahahahahahaha...

This type was officially forbidden to own, with harsh penalties if found, for decades after 1741. There's a well-documented case from around 1770 (I forgot the exact date) where a guy accidentally missed one of those rubles getting slipped to him in circulation, and despite extensive defence, still got the full punishment.

This means that, unless we're dealing with the ludicrously rare coincidence of a counterfeiter making the very newest type (already unlikely) and the resulting coin surviving the next few decades (extremely unlikely), any counterfeits of the 1741 ruble would have been deliberate forgeries to fool collectors.
Valued Member
Learn More...
United States
466 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2019  7:15 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Sharkman to your friends list
John-
The seller listed the weight, which I haven't seen done before, although I really don't know a lot about world coins. Why is it exactly the specified weight rather than some other amount within permitted tolerances? Maybe the seller looked it up like you did. Given the odiferous nature of this listing, I have my doubts the seller actually weighed it.
Valued Member
Learn More...
United States
466 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2019  7:44 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Sharkman to your friends list
Curiosity question: would a TPG holder a valuable contemporary counterfeit labeling it as such? It is valuable, it it historical, it is collectible. Or would it get the same body bag treatment as a modern counterfeit?
Valued Member
Learn More...
United States
466 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2019  7:59 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Sharkman to your friends list
Everyone, here's your chance to get in on the action. Same dude has counterfeit 1727/6 Russian coin listed with a stated retail value of $3,000. Bidding is currently at $12.00. Get 'em while they're hot!
Edited by Sharkman
11/27/2019 8:03 pm
Pillar of the Community
United States
1757 Posts
 Posted 11/28/2019  01:31 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add colonialjohn to your friends list
Its an interesting group. Consider also we now see (4) counterfeits and/or one coin with no verification possible. He spent probably $160+ or more w/ PCGS to wind up with (4) body bags. I did not know the initial coin in this thread was illegal to own but the SKILL necessary to use debased metals to get the weight correct is quite remarkable so looking at his other merchandise he probably looked it up and assumed the weight was as written in KM? Its unusual but I guess at this level (Christian Book Seller?) he took a gamble with PCGS. However somebody paid some big money on this first coin ... however I am sure the weight will be different than KM and agree Sharkman a scale was not used on this coin and then compared to KM - probably <BG>. These pieces look like good forgeries. I am tracking them but unfortunately my research on CCCs has never gone into Russian coins. TPG will body bag all counterfeits but there are noted exceptions based on certain collections, series and other factors - such as U.S. Colonial Machins Mills pieces of Newburgh, NY or well documented copies from noted forgers or die makers like Bolen, Wyatt, etc... also if a big collection of Counterfeit 8 Reales as in Gurney's case a company like Stacks/Bowers could label the coins with GNL #'s and even place his name on the PCGS holder - exceptions are made when certain coins cross the block. Would not surprise me ... seriously. Look recently at the Stacks/Bowers Nov. 2019 Whitman Show (C4 Convention) and the Robert Martin Collection of U.S. Colonials and some well known copies in his collection going 4-figures. Martin was a noted Connecticut collector who passed away around a year ago.

See here:

https://auctions.stacksbowers.com/l...bout-as-made

See also this counterfeit Spanish American piece confirmed by that shaddy notorious character named Lorenzo. See here:

https://auctions.stacksbowers.com/l...in-edge-fine

LOL

John Lorenzo
Numismatist
United States
Edited by colonialjohn
11/28/2019 01:38 am
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
United States
7963 Posts
 Posted 11/28/2019  07:14 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add tdziemia to your friends list
I agreee that it gets "curiouser and curiouser."

The bible seller now has some certified rarities, and some old Russian pocket change up for auction.

The 1898 coin is likely headed over $2,000. maybe closer to $3,000 based on recent sales in Europe.
Edited by tdziemia
11/28/2019 07:39 am
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts
 Posted 11/29/2019  4:29 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add basebal21 to your friends list

Quote:
Curiosity question: would a TPG holder a valuable contemporary counterfeit labeling it as such?


There are some that they will do. As of now ICG is the only one that will slab all counterfeits in an educational slab if requested
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
United States
7963 Posts
 Posted 11/30/2019  10:11 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add tdziemia to your friends list

Quote:
The 1898 coin is likely headed over $2,000.


Sold for $2,011.
And the counterfeits only fetched $10 and $25.

Sanity reigns again.
Page 2 of 2   Previous TopicReplies: 22 / Views: 4,259Next Topic Page 2 of 2
First Page  Showing last 15 replies.
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.


    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.38 seconds to rattle this change. Forums