| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 2,216 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
Difficult to grade these with TV pics. I'll say MS-63......and as always, I'm the worst at grading gold.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6595 Posts |
MS-65  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
I see slight wear near the ear (obv)
on the tip of leading edge of eagle's wing (rev).
AU-58.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
227 Posts |
I will take a stab at it: MS 62/63
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7626 Posts |
64 based on these tired old eyes
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1776 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7059 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2340 Posts |
I'll guess MS63...maybe MS64.
smat
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18687 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4469 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
Well that's about as close as I get when it comes to grading gold.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1023 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
The coin was a recent submission to PCGS and the dealer who submitted was complaining about PCGS undegrading the coin and selling it to me at the 62 grade price. The dealer was expecting a grade of 64 and a minimum grade of 63.
The luster on the coin is good. PCGS may have thought that the coin had some circulation rub on the wing tip, and if that is the case, PCGS should have graded the coin at 58.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5191 Posts |
Quote:
The coin was a recent submission to PCGS and the dealer who submitted was complaining about PCGS undegrading the coin and selling it to me at the 62 grade price. Instead of complaining, the dealer could have: 1) Resubmitted the coin to NGC 2) Charged MS63 prices regardless. |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 2,216 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 12/10/2020 4:42 pm
