| Author |
 Replies: 20 / Views: 3,525 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
Assuming it straight graded then I'll guess AU50. From your comments and the images I assume it got a genuine grade.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8940 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3167 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
2145 Posts |
Not very good at grading high end Half Cents - Just to say it's a beautiful coin! |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2346 Posts |
The obverse really carries her...beautiful finish and eye appeal!
I would say AU55-58 Plain 4 No stems.
Lovely example!
smat
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18729 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5689 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3402 Posts |
If the "crap" on the reverse can be conserved, I'm going to go with AU58...if not then AU50/53.
KK
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1792 Posts |
She's a beauty, I'll say AU-55
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
758 Posts |
It's hard to see in this poor photo--but PCGS called it AU(53). Is it worth sending in for "conservation?" as was suggested?  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
Nice example!
I personally would be hesitant on conservation, due to the fact that it's EAC. No guaranty what will be to conserve the coin will keep it from going into a Details slab.
@Adam590, you said you disagreed with the grade, what do you feel it should have gotten? Curious.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
758 Posts |
I thought it was an AU(55). The details seem quite strong to me. I like the coin and think it is a strong example for its type.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18729 Posts |
i would not send this coin in. nice example  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3675 Posts |
Beautiful coin!
I'd leave it as is. Any bourse floor discussion would be upward from the assigned grade. I'm not a big fan of CAC, but that might be the better way to go. There wouldn't be any real downside to submission. The reverse crud likely can't be conserved, and the risk of detailing the coin by conservation has already been noted.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 20 / Views: 3,525 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 12/27/2020 10:21 pm
