| Author |
Replies: 20 / Views: 8,889 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2004 Posts |
I have one like this too but the folks on here seem to be of the opinion that it is a Texas Cent (squeezed between leather and the plating pops off). That's why people are asking for weight, diameter and thickness.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
97685 Posts |
MisterT.. you beat me out. I was going to post that
|
|
New Member
 United States
11 Posts |
I just checked the coin and it is not magnetic. The only scale I have is a kitchen scale so it is imprecise, to say the least. When I weighed a few wheat cents they consistently weighed at 3 grams. When I weighed this 1995 penny it weighed 2 grams all but one time and weighed 3 grams once. When I weighed a "normal" penny from 1989 it was evenly split between 2 and 3 grams. The scale I was using only used whole numbers, so the weights I came up with are likely rounded up or down by the scale, so there is probably not much that can be learned by that.
Similarly, I do not have any tools that can measure the width or thickness down to the small increments that would be required to find such a small difference in size. The 1995 and 1989 coins appear to be the same size when looking at them.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4963 Posts |
A more precise weight would be good, but it sounds like it's roughly consistent with the expected 2.5 g. Even if you can't measure the diameter, can you compare it to a normal coin? Even if it's just slightly wider, that could mean it's a "Texas cent."
|
|
Valued Member
United States
440 Posts |
If you sit in under another cent, does it appear to be bigger? Sometimes it's really obvious when you do that.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7076 Posts |
So when weighting coins (cents) with a kitchen scale, why not stack up 12 or 14 post 1983 cents, then replace the top cent with the one in question...see if that gets you a different reading...only a suggestion, haven't had the need to do this, but what the heck...nothing to lose
Edited by Greasy Fingers 04/29/2021 01:08 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2004 Posts |
Dearborn, I believe it was you who gave me that education so in fact you do deserve the credit for that explanation.
|
|
New Member
 United States
11 Posts |
IsThisAnything- When I place one coin on top of the other there is no distinguishable difference in size. Both coins hide perfectly under each other, so they appear to be the same size.
I tried stacking the coins as Greasy Fingers suggested and the results were inconclusive. The scale I am using is not sensitive enough to pick up the slight differences in weight.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
97685 Posts |
can you post up a picture of the coin in question again, trying to get rid of all that glare that is washing out the image?
|
|
Moderator
 United States
97685 Posts |
Quote: Dearborn, I believe it was you who gave me that education so in fact you do deserve the credit for that explanation. Thank you for the credit, but I think that we both can take credit for it, plus I think it was Coop that taught me, so I think it was a collaboration of folks here that help to get the answers we all seek.
Edited by Dearborn 04/29/2021 2:44 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189502 Posts |
 to the Community!
|
|
New Member
 United States
11 Posts |
Dearborn- I added two new pictures to the original post. I was able to get rid of most of the glare by turning off the flash on my camera. It affected the color of the coin a bit because of shadows, but the surface of the coin is more visible.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
721 Posts |
I'm no expert!!! Could it be a pattern coin to evaluate the design? I see a difference in the ear, but to much glare to see the rest. I'm just curiouse about that. I remember reading something about this.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
97685 Posts |
looking at the new pictures, it's hard to tell what's going on with the obverse, but the reverse does seem to have the copper cladding on if.
|
|
New Member
 United States
11 Posts |
Dearborn- The pictures of the reverse have a brownish tint because of the filters I used to reduce the glare, which is why both the formica and the coin have that tint. The formica is blue, like in the picture I posted of the front of the coin. The fourth picture with the silver colored front of the coin and the blue formica is the actual color.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 20 / Views: 8,889 |
Page 2 of 2
|