| Author |
 Replies: 18 / Views: 4,477 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
Can't really tell from you images . Must include whole coin in your pics obverse and reverse . Looks either burnt to a crisp or a ground find but I'm leaning towards fire .  |
|
Moderator
 United States
54283 Posts |
Quote:
I am holding something very very special here When you make a topic here, you need to state very very clearly what you think is "very very special" about the coin. Show your financial support of the Coin Community Family (click here)See my topic on Mexican Numismatic Medals (click here) |
|
Moderator
United States
54283 Posts |
Looks like a 1999-P to me that's been buried for quite a while.
Show your financial support of the Coin Community Family (click here)See my topic on Mexican Numismatic Medals (click here) |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10284 Posts |
The second picture (reverse) looks like an AU coin that has toned. It looks like a completely different coin than that 4th image (reverse) to me.   Edited by TNG
05/01/2021 08:33 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Dug coin almost certainly.  to the CCF! |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6608 Posts |
Quote:
but yes these pictures are all of the same nickel  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
|
|
New Member
 United States
29 Posts |
So the first 2 pictures is the same coin I got from a coin roll. Every single one of these coins have a weird double mint mark when you turn the coin and take a picture of it sideways. That's how the I got the first 2 images. They are 1991 and so on series and when you turn them slightly every single one of them has the "99" looking like "00"
|
|
New Member
United States
29 Posts |
Also on the reverse side of the coin next to the building you can see a large S.
|
|
New Member
United States
29 Posts |
@TNG. That's what I was saying because these pictures are from the same coin. But after looking at them closely they look like they have been punched multiple times. And the whole roll is like this but not toned. But every single one of them have almost the same identical looking mint mark punch
|
|
New Member
United States
29 Posts |
   Third image is of the same coin and above the head it looks like there is a missprint of some sort The first 2 pictures are of a 1988. I will get better pictures of the mints later and they all look the same once you tilt the coin slightly |
|
Valued Member
United States
173 Posts |
Sorry Apetrou78, I am confused. It looks like you posted pics of two coins as you mentioned. We ask that you limit your topic to one coin only to lessen the chance of confusion.
Based on what I see the dark coins look like environmental damage which is wearing off since it was removed from the damaging environment. The edges and several high spots, and hits are the normal color of a circulated nickel.
With the first coin, you ask a qusetion about what you see with the date when you turn it sideways but you only posted 2 not so clear pics of the reverse?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10635 Posts |
Well, I am confused. One coin or two (or more?)? The mark coin has environmental tarnishing/staining/discolouration, most likely from being buried in soil or heat damage, as others here have mentioned. Nothing special, not a mint error, no premium I'm afraid.  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'm totally confused.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2404 Posts |
I resemble that remark  |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 18 / Views: 4,477 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 05/01/2021 08:20 am
