| Author |
 Replies: 22 / Views: 1,653 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Surely this not a 65.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1694 Posts |
  Coinfrog most my other pics come out the same . Here are a few blasting light on it haha. I will say this is a pretty nice one in hand. My photo skills need work. |
|
Pillar of the Community
2224 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
614 Posts |
 MS 64 |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Now we have too much glare.  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
Flat impact over Lib's eyebrow.
Not sure if the TPGrader would have noticed.
Can't be a high point light strike, because there are no other high points like this, on either side.
Without that problem, this coin would have otherwise graded at
MS-64.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18702 Posts |
I'm at MS64 also on this one.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1298 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3663 Posts |
The issue over the eye appears to be a lamination.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6396 Posts |
Agree with fortcollins: currently 64, could regrade now as 65. Pretty Morgan!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36845 Posts |
Looks like an MS-64 to me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
In the 65 to 66 range. Hard to tell which from this set of photos.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1694 Posts |
This one is Graded in a Old PCGS Green holder MS-64 Prooflike . In hand I think she is a 64+
This coin is highly reflective and shows everything.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3663 Posts |
JasonKflo, a couple quick thoughts.
This may be one to leave in its current slab. Most of us believe the OGH era had more conservative grading than today. I've upward adjusted purchase prices for quite a few OGH coins, and I guess many others have as well. That's a common bargaining issue on bourse floors, and value adjustment regrading on the bourse floor is less risky than resubmission to PCGS. PCGS has become a bit picky about PL designations lately and has given 93 codes to laminations, as well. There is at least some risk they could do that.
Just some thoughts to kick around.
Really nice coin. Thanks for sharing it with us!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1694 Posts |
Thanks Fort Collins . I have no plans to resubmit it . Even if it came back a grade higher it's not worth the hassle and I like these holders the best. As far as coin being prooflike and them being harder on prooflike now than before. This coin is exceptionally prooflike that is not a concern. I have quite a few prooflike coins and this is more so than most I have.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 22 / Views: 1,653 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 09/12/2021 7:29 pm
