| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 3,477 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
 United Kingdom
67 Posts |
@ JimmyD That doesn't sound so good. Would you recommend trying to wipe it off with a cloth?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
21633 Posts |
As I stated, they cannot be removed. The oils in your skin eventually etch
into the coin leaving a permanent mark.
Wiping with a cloth would only make things worse. Your going to have to leave it as is.
The only thing you could have done was soak it in acetone immediately after you touched
it and there still is no guarantee that the fingerprint would have been removed.
Edited by JimmyD
10/01/2021 6:33 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34428 Posts |
I'd think an acetone soak would be your best shot, but agree that you need to keep expectations low.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push."
-----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed."
-----King Adz
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
67 Posts |
@JimmyD and @Spence thank you, I may try that.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
Over a period of a century or so, 22 ct gold coins can tone very slowly in aggressive storage conditions, due to the copper in the alloy.
If you go to Google Images, search for '1887 Victoria proof double sovereign', look for those coins that have had slight scuffing to the raised parts of the design, and you will see how 22ct gold can adopt an 'old gold' tone.
Very difficult to be sure in this case, but if they are fingerprints, they have been there for a very long time.
Acetone may help if those stains are recent, but not if they have been there for decades.
Give acetone a go anyway, it will certainly not do any harm.
Edited by sel_69l
10/02/2021 01:20 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5676 Posts |
Likely fingerprints, but unlikely that you caused them (if you acquired the piece recently). Gold is not very reactive, so they were probably there years ago. Definitely don't try to wipe them off if acetone doesn't work.
|
|
Moderator
United States
56855 Posts |
Can it be professionally "conserved" by PCGS and would it be worth all costs involved in doing so? John1  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
I would not think it is worth the cost of having it conserved. To be honest, I had a hard time trying to see the evidence of 'fingerprinting'. Even if that evidence may be there, it is certainly only a very mild detracting feature, especially so when this coin does not appear to be a proof. If it were my coin, I would be perfectly happy, and very tempted to leave it alone.  "Glorious inaction", as Sir Humphrey would be apt to say. Not all coins are perfect, and neither am I. |
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
67 Posts |
@ sel_69l, @ John1, @ Zurie thank you all! This really helps
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4594 Posts |
However, you could contact The Sun ... they would love to splash a headline "COULD BE Jack the Ripper's FIRST VICTIM - Victoria Sovereign with his fingerprint"
-----Burton 50+ year / Life / Emeritus ANA member (joined 12/1/1973) Life member: Numismatics International, CONECA Member: TNA, FtWCC, NETCC, EveryCountry (online) coin club Owned by three cats and a wife of 40+ years (joined 1983) Author: 3rd Edition of the Sample Slabs book, https://www.sampleslabs.info/ |
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
251 Posts |
The real question here is why you wasn't wearing gloves to put an antique gold coin in a capsule. I can understand not bothering for lower value coins but a coin of this magnitude, you really should have been taking more precautions.
Nonetheless, the bright side is that others seem to agree that you didn't cause the damage and honestly even on the zoomed in pictures it was hard to make it out. I'd just advise you invest in a pair of gloves to handle such coins with.
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
67 Posts |
@ Collector28, thanks for the advice. @ BStrauss3, very funny, perhaps I will do that! :-D
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1616 Posts |
Quote:
The real question here is why you wasn't wearing gloves to put an antique gold coin in a capsule. I can understand not bothering for lower value coins but a coin of this magnitude, you really should have been taking more precautions.
 When transferring noodled and bought coins to storage I often use bare hands but always give my hands a wash before handling to remove grease and then give the coin an acetone wipe before final placement. Coins destined for capsules are only handled with coin tweezers once cleaned with acetone. Edited by David Graham
10/06/2021 5:28 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5248 Posts |
Third party graders do not use gloves, I have been told.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
I can confirm this, with the Youtube videos I have seen.
However, in all the videos in every case, every coin is handled at by the edge only, by what appears to be a matter of habit and training.
I would think the reason for this is that there is less probability of accidently dropping a coin.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 3,477 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 10/01/2021 6:25 pm
