| Author |
 Replies: 19 / Views: 1,535 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'll say AU-58, rim nick detracts.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3207 Posts |
5FS usually means the bottom step is not visible, and was created because there are numerous dates/mints for which there are no 6 step examples, possibly because the bottom step had been worn off the hub from which dies were made
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
588 Posts |
So the 5FS, is a variety only given to nickels? And is always talking about the steps?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
292 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19186 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3659 Posts |
Fairly strong central strike from a VLDS die pair. It's a decent AU example.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
588 Posts |
I was noticing how the details were blurry, or not well defined, as u moved towards the rim
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3207 Posts |
yes, FS stands for Full Steps, and refers to the steps on Monticello
steps are sometimes also discussed in regard to the Lincoln Memorial
surprised by the number of AU grades here, to me frosty luster like that on this example's Monticello is the first thing to go during circulation
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1406 Posts |
Surprised too, I see quite a bit of contact marks but no sign of wear. I would put this on the low end of MS.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
588 Posts |
So Die Deterioration doesn't take away from any grade? A coin which has no evidence of Die Deterioration will have same value of a coin that does show evidence, if all other factors are the same? |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3207 Posts |
the higher the MS grade gets, the more cosmetic issues and eye appeal factor into the grade, below MS-65 things like Die Deterioration are generally ignored for grading purposes above MS-65, graders also take into consideration the typical quality for the date/mint, so for example if few or no examples with great eye appeal exist for a given date, graders will not subtract much for things like strike quality without such an allowance, dates that are notorious for weak strikes, like the 1922 cent, would have no examples with a high grade |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
588 Posts |
Interesting! Sound a lil subjective, over 65 at least! Is there a comprehensive list of the years with weak strikes? I have a few '46 Lincoln's that I'm looking at a lil closer, seems the 4 & 6 aren't as well defined as the 1 & 9 in almost every one I have lined up! Is that indicative of Die Deterioration |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3207 Posts |
that can be Die Deterioration or a press pushing the die with relatively less force than usual I've never seen a list of weak strike dates, but it might exist. For nickels, 1954 and 1955 are years with lots of weak stike coins. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
AU or low MS, no appreciable difference in value. Either way, this coin will sell at a discount with those hits.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
588 Posts |
Thanks guys! And I appreciate the explanations nick10!
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 19 / Views: 1,535 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 02/19/2022 11:12 am
