1943 D (RPM?) Lincoln Cent?

Reprocessed cent. (Plated.) Now just a what cent. The original ones would be dull looking in gloss:

I'm still going to say reprocessed. Don't think it's a RMM.

So, Dearborn, is this something that would have been done at the mint, or post mint? The reason I ask is these coins were probably part of my uncle's collection, coins he picked up when he and grandpa went to the coin shop as he was growing up. He was killed in a car accident in 1963 and was 24 at the time. So if the replating was post-mint, was that something they were doing in the 1940's and 50's, when he was a kid? (I'm basing the provenance on the fact that they're included in an album that appears to have been his).

Thanks, Silviosi. I meant to reply to your question about whether I thought any of the examples on the Wexler page looked like what I was seeing (the abrasion doubling). WRPM-023 is really similar to what I see on my coin, but I don't see the die cracks on the tie. Also, WRPM-032 shows what I'm seeing to the east of the numbers.

Anyway, given Uncle Dan was a kid when he bought these, it's very possible he wouldn't have recognized replating, if they were doing that back then. I'm just wondering if they were doing it when he would have been collecting—the coins would have been pretty common and cheap at the time.

@twslisa: The re-plating was done after it left the mint. The Machine Doubling is caused by the hammer die bouncing and/or a loose set-up with the equipment. I remember the first time I chemically altered my copper cent coins. (turning them gold and silver - That was in the late '60's. So it is possible the re-plating was done 'way back then'.
Now that all said, after looking at your latest images, I'm willing to entertain the thought that it was not re-plated - it does look a bit more of a matte finish (as it should) without the coin in hand it is hard to tell sometimes with just photos. (Your first set of images do have a lot of glare and that may give it the appearance of a re-plate job.

The 43 cents were steel, they didn't take circulation very well. They rusted. Sometime in the late 40s or early 50s plating companies would take 100 of your rusty cents, clean them up and replate them sending you back 50 nice and shiny coins. They made their money on the 50 they kept.

I really appreciate all the info, guys! Really, thanks for all your help.

I'm a little reluctant to take it out of the flip because the writing on it was my grandpa's. On one hand, I'm the only person still around who would care—and it will eventually go to my beneficiary who never knew him. OTOH, it's a little something remaining of the man who patiently read the same stories to me over and over until I could tell them from memory, and who put me through college, debt-free, when he didn't have to (he was my mom's stepdad). That makes it a hard choice. Obviously, I'm asking all these questions more to learn about the coins than to determine their value, since the only way I'd even think of selling is if it was that or starve.