Cents Like This Isn't Common - 1992-D Lincoln Cent - Pictures And Assumptions And Explanations

OK how about this going picture-by-picture:
1. Overall coin pic It looks like there is some die polishing around the chin and eye area
2/3. Date and MM Looks like split plating and some zinc bubbles/rot.
4. Under the ear and jaw line Seems to be more zinc bubbles
5. the WAM Yes, it is a WAM (which is normal for this year) and what appears to be staining on the surface of the coin.
6/7. reported as extra columns This is the normal appearance for this coin. Behind columns 1 and 12 are secondary columns that wrap around the building. Behind columns 5 and 8 are the wall openings to the inner chamber.

8. FG I see more staining to the east of it.
9. Liberty Possible DDD or MD - a far reach could be the start of a Ridge Ring - but not likely
10. close-up of chin same as image 1 - looks like die polishing to me

Hey I appreciate that reply. And replying in that order makes it pretty simple to go back and look at each individual thing with more clarity. Now about the zinc bubbles, wouldn't it be unlikely that a zinc bubble would form in a way that pretty much any letter looks like besides maybe "o" or something vaguely shaped similar? I ask because I thought the one I assumed as "D", I mean it actually looks to me like a bulging circular bubble object. I say that while I'm about to say this again as well, the thing that looks, at least to me, like an "s" on the neck, I took screenshots of that picture how it is there, and with the exposure setting in photo editing up at max and at the lowest low. I'll attach the two new photos as zoomed in as I can, in any case that thing on Lincoln's image's neck looks like an "s" to me whether the photo is how it looked or bright as it goes or as shaded as it goes. Please, view for yourselves.





I do see where it could look fat, on the thing that I say looks like an "s", there on it's East side but regardless, whatever that is it's a different shade and my point still remains as simple as it was before, the form that the thing is in looks just like an "s". If this coin was only worth face value I'd still be saying that because that's just common sense, and I'm not talking bad if anyone sees it differently, I'm saying for me to say it don't look like how it looks, that makes no sense.

Zinc bubbles take on many shapes, sometimes they are trails - we call them linear zinc bubbles. The zinc dust on the uncoated planchet will indicate which direction the bubble will form. Also an 'S' shape could just be part of a round bubble that is not yet finished forming., but once it bursts out, it just becomes a mess.

Now if you read that and looked and you still just don't see how any of it looks the way I say I think it looks, then okay. That is not a problem. I guess at this point I'd say we might have both got in this conversation thinking what we thought was right and that is that unless someone can convince you otherwise. But even off that little "zinc bubble" under the ear, I used quotation marks because I don't know, how could there be a reflection on it? My point here is that, and once again I'm asking, shouldn't a light source coming from above the coin hit and reflect off the high points, the raised portions and pieces, of the coin first? Then it might reflect the lower "base" level if you'll excuse my terminology if you turn the coin or provide a different angle for the light to hit first, but the coin laying flat and a light shining on it from above, the raised parts of the coin reflect first and quite brightly. And that is one very long winded way of saying if how the "things" got 'ON' there then it was placed there. I did not say the mint placed those "things" the things that look like letters, on the coin. I don't know who placed it on there or how it got on there. The point is, it got 'ON' there, as in it's a raised point above the general "height" of the coin, so it was likely done on purpose. If those parts of the coin were not raised up, as in if it was showing because material was removed in whatever fashion the shape is in, and therefore if those spots were actually low points, because it would be lower than "base" because in that case material would have been removed for that shape to be there, if that was the case then I wouldn't still be typing this long response out, because then about this specific coin it's value at least, the "how" to me wouldn't be as important as knowing that the coin is face value and that is that. I hope someone can make sense of that because I about forgot the point I was making typing that much. But since that is not the case because such "things" do reflect light and therefore are likely "high points" or raised areas on the coins surface, I'm back to what my 4 questions were in my second post of this thread.

I looked at some of your other posts, and you sure see a lot of things others do not on your coins. Seems like it happens a lot, and you do not like the answers you are getting.

If by not liking the answers you actually mean trying to figure it out and ask questions that might be obvious to those who already know a lot but not to the person who was asking a different question about the same coins in the first place, then sure. You sure seem to think you got me figured out after one response in my thread where you relayed little to no information and yet there is my honest response. I could care less if my questioning offends you or others, and I was long winded in some of my points but I didn't think I would need to spell out letter by letter exactly the question or a question very similar to what I was asking before someone who isn't me started talking about a subject I didn't bring up that had nothing to do with the coins themselves, or beat it over my head that the coins didn't come from the mint like that when I said that's fine I just want to know what it is. And if that's what it is then I responded about that in my response right before this one. So,what do you care you're just wasting my time and I'm still being honest with you. Here to learn about coins not how people feel about certain questions I ask.

Maybe on your dime I would but not after hearing what the majority consensus of this thread has said. And posting pictures and asking questions about the coin I knew little about is and was my goal of starting this thread, just because some don't like that I may question still what that means or the likelihood of a specific scenario whether it be the case of my coin or not, doesn't mean I'm not going to ask more about it. Nobody had to continue to respond, I didn't either. And I get it, you might have thought you were being funny saying to have the coin graded and to let you all know how that goes, after reading all the posts in this thread, I may not always be the kindest speaker or writer but the people seem sure and the coin is just a coin to me, I'll be asking about the next one I find whoever I ask about it. I found it interesting how different this coin was compared to other Lincoln cents, then to other cents of the same year and mint. I might have not known the exact reason how it happened which is why I asked but I personally haven't seen a coin like that where what could be just zinc issues regardless of what it is when I saw it and posted it, looked like letters. I appreciate that people still are trying to let me know, and whoever posted their response out per picture, someone send that persona coin because they know how to answer a question like a science test