| Author |
 Replies: 18 / Views: 1,719 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3848 Posts |
Zero chance it is mint state. There is hardly any luster left! AU-50.
Suffering from bust half fever. Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: http://goccf.com/t/434955Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1788 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1959 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1776 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2286 Posts |
Dsking- I've noticed you keep mentioning TPG's and 10x loupes. Some graders grade coins naked eye, and if needed they use a 5x, not a 10x. Under higher magnification a coin looks worse, so that theory of it can grade higher under a 10x is a fallacy. You realize when you know how to think, it empowers you far beyond those who know only what to think.
-Neil deGrasse Tyson
Edited by NumismaticsFTW
05/12/2023 5:55 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2365 Posts |
Then why does PCGS mention using a 5x or 10x Loupe? https://www.PCGS.com/news/tools-of-...g%20problems.
Quote:The most common loupes found with graders and discerning collectors will be from 5X to 10X power. Anything higher than 10 will generally only be used for Counterfeit Detection, variety attribution, and numeric grade limiting problems. The proper way to use a loupe is to bring it all the way up to your eye, only a few millimeters away, then bring the coin up to the glass until it is in focus. The most common mistake with a loupe is using it at arms-length to view a coin. This doesn't give the user a complete field of vision and clarity. And yes the first go-around is with the naked eye. We grade on CCF looking at every detail of the coins from photos or scopes. Wouldn't that make our grades lower or higher than a professional grader because of everything that we look at that a pro would not otherwise see? Additionally, a pro grader will have the coin in-hand and may increase or decrease our guesstimates due to seeing the coin in it's true form. They may choose to use a Loupe or not depending upon the coin. Jaobler: I'm sorry that we got off-track. I certainly didn't mean to cause a ruckus over my "loupe" comment. You have a lovely coin and a valuable one. Great acquisition! Edited by dsking
05/12/2023 10:09 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
620 Posts |
Nice coin. I would say AU 55 or 58 based on the wear on the high points obv and reverse.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
I'd be in the high AU group —- AU58. Nice older half eagle!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
Looks AU to me with a wipe that's probably maret-acceptable on an 1845 gold piece.
I might be a touch low but my guess is AU53.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5192 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18696 Posts |
very similar to the 1860. the reverse here is a tad better but I think the overall coin is not enough to make AU58 due to the missing luster on both sides. i'll stay with AU55 on this one also
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6394 Posts |
Another NGC AU-55 gold piece. Given the way prices for older gold coins tend to take off for any MS grade it's a good bet that most of my gold will fall into the AU range. Thanks for the comments!  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5192 Posts |
Looks great!  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2365 Posts |
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 18 / Views: 1,719 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 05/12/2023 12:51 am
