| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 1,029 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
94367 Posts |
Not the best pics, bur guessing MS-64 or better,
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21639 Posts |
 with Coinfrog.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
58692 Posts |
I'm with Coinfrog.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
33743 Posts |
Looks MS but photo lighting is making hard to see the luster an surfaces.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
17535 Posts |
you photo lighting is just washing out the coin. I'm not sure what the in-hand surfaces actually look like.
the stars are well struck up. I think the obv is weak strike more than wear. without better photos I can see it at MS64 as well depending on remaining luster which I can't really tell from these.
Edited by panzaldi
10/07/2024 1:09 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3710 Posts |
Need clearer photos, can't even see contact marks.
Suffering from bust half fever. Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: https://goccf.com/t/434955Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves. |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3517 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
528 Posts |
Mpmedia, are you happy with the grade? AU58 seems to be the right call. The obverse does seem to have some rub. Otherwise it is a very nice looking Shield nickel! Edited by adam126402
01/03/2025 6:27 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10952 Posts |
looks like it's been overdipped.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3517 Posts |
Quote:
. happy with the grade? No way I put a close-up of the shield That I personally took, and wanted to specifically find out if there is any wear in that region. If it's not in that area, then where would it be? I still think it's at least a 63. I'd appreciate somebody picking apart the PCGS photo and pointing out where I'm wrong or right with justification to have it resubmitted for reconsideration.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4393 Posts |
The following issues are what I see that brings it down to AU58: Only showing luster in the protected areas around the letters on both the obverse and reverse. I circled in blue the area of the shield that is showing circulation rub. The design lines are almost gone from wear. The tip of the leaf is also showing some circulation rub.  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I know it's no consolation, but the coin certainly is an attractive example.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10952 Posts |
I hadn't clicked on the PCGS link. The areas that slider points out could be a function of a weak strike. For me, the more salient difference is in the surfaces. Gold and silver are significantly softer than nickel and as a result, luster or the surface ridges look different in nickel coins. The ridges/luster in gold and silver coins are higher and more pronounced. The luster on nickel coins tends to be more subtle and fragile. One way that I see this as a circulated coin is that in neither the original pictures, nor the trueview, do you see any luster. This indicates to me that the luster has worn off, or has been chemically removed. Lustrous nickels tend to reflect light and look bright. Nickels without luster tend to look grey or dull.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7176 Posts |
i also tend to agree with the PCGS grading of AU58 ,your second image posted show's a clear and defined slight circulation wear on the upper shield lines. Quote:
I'd appreciate somebody picking apart the PCGS photo and pointing out where I'm wrong or right with justification to have it resubmitted for reconsideration. I don't believe anyone is trying to prove you wrong here, you asked member's opinion and it was given. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4393 Posts |
There is wear/circulation rub on the shield. Compare your AU 58 to a AU55 and MS63 OP PCGS AU 58 1883  PCGS AU 55 1883  PCGS MS63 1883  |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 1,029 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 10/05/2024 11:07 pm
