| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 2,179 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
124 Posts |
In my opinion judging from the photos, I would say a solid G. My 6th edition ANA book states that 2-4 letters in 'Liberty' are necessary for VG. I cannot tell if there are letters in 'Liberty' from those pictures. So G-6 is what I think. |
|
Valued Member
United States
303 Posts |
I also agree with G and also with corrision. I don't see any letters in LIBERTY.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
615 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
178 Posts |
The astute forum members are correct. It has been graded G, as there are no letters showing in Liberty. But my pics are nice.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2602 Posts |
G with corrosion and cleaning.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
178 Posts |
What makes you think it was cleaned?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2540 Posts |
"What makes you think it was cleaned?"
Just because some people always say that everything was cleaned.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
178 Posts |
Quote:
"What makes you think it was cleaned?"
Just because some people always say that everything was cleaned. This coin has definitely not been cleaned. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2541 Posts |
Congrats on owning one. I'm working on that set, but I'm not sure I'll acquire that one anytime soon!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2602 Posts |
I don't say there is cleaning on every coin I make an attempt to grade, in fact, I hardly ever say that. This coin on the obverse is redder in color on the letters and date and especailly portrait than in the field. This led me to think it has been lightly cleaned at some point. This is only my opinion and I may be wrong- may have to do with the lighting or flash, etc. The reverse looks more normal-looking though, so cleaning may have only been one side. If flash/lighting were same on each side, than the OBV coloring is most likely due to cleaning.
Even if it has been cleaned, to me it does not detract from the coin at all. It is a very nice piece. But I think if you send it in to PCGS, it will get a "Genuine" stamp with no grade.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1882 Posts |
Quote:
This coin on the obverse is redder in color on the letters and date and especailly portrait than in the field. The "clean" areas are the high points...which is normal for a circulated coin that has *not* been cleaned, correct? Edited by steve199
06/01/2009 4:52 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
615 Posts |
I am thinking the same thing Steve199 is thinking. It is worn more on those high points... wearing away the dark corrosion areas.
I wouldn't pay $825 for it due to the corrosion problem. Plus I would want a key date like that slabbed.
-SFWUSC
|
|
Valued Member
United States
178 Posts |
"Plus I would want a key date like that slabbed."
Slabbed coins command a premium price. Would you be willing to pay for the additional cost of having it slabbed?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
615 Posts |
If I was going to buy the coin, then I would require it be slabbed. I am not trying to put together that set so I don't want to purchase it. Why would you not get it slabbed since you are trying to sell it? You will get what you pay to get it slabbed back out of it, and maybe more? How does a buyer know it is Genuine? You might know it is Genuine, but they might not. A coin dealer tried to sell me a 1916d Mercury dime for $900 that was likely F-12. It wasn't slabbed. Why in the world would someone sell a very popular key date so far below market value? Slabbed it would get around twice his asking price. Something wasn't right. -SFWUSC |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,179 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 05/22/2009 5:30 pm
